1 Bildiriler Kitab II Sakarya 2 No: 95 6 ISBN: 978-605-4735-23-5 VI. Ulu : : Emrehan : Ebru ALBAYRAK, Murat TOPAL - E-posta: egitim@sakarya.edu.tr aittir. 8 indekiler/Contents ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Bilim Kurulu ................................................................................................................................................... 5 ..................................................................................................................... 7 ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 , Ahmet AKIN, vd ................................................................................................................... 11 , Ahmet AKIN, vd......................................................................................................... 15 , vd .................................................................................................................. 19 Ahmet AKIN, n , , vd ....................................................................................... 23 , vd ............................................................................................... 30 , , ............................................................................................................................. 39 , vd ................................................................................................... 45 Ahmet AKIN, lirlenmesi, ................................................................................................................................. 51 , ........................................................................................................ 62 , .............................................................................................................................................. 68 , .................................................................................. Derslerinde Verimlilikleri, .......................................................................................................... , ............................................................ , ................................................................................................. 76 85 91 98 , Murat KARAMAN vd .................................................................................................................................. 104 - , Mustafa BAYRAKCI vd ............................................................................................................................... 111 , ........................................................................................................ 120 , Hande POYRAZ ........................................................................................................................................... 128 15 Ahmet AKIN* ** **** *** Handan TOPRAK **** Banu YILDIZ**** **** Bu eiX o- Deon The Turkish Version of the Deontic Justice Scale: The Validity and Reliability Study Abstract The aim of the present study is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Deontic Justice Scale (Beugre, 2012). Participants were 366 university students. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that 18 items loaded on three factors and the goodness of fit index values of the model were x p= .00101, RMSEA= .039, CFI= .94, IFI= .95, GFI= .93, AGFI= .71, SRMR= .051. The alpha internal consistency coefficients were found .87 for overall scale and .75, .77, .85 for three subscales respectively. The corrected item-total correlations ranged from .32 and .62. Overall findings demonstrated that Turkish version of the Deontic Justice Scale is a valid and reliable instrument. Keywords: Deontic justice, validity, reliability, confirmatory factor analysis. * -yanl u- y sisteminden kay- m2003). Immanuel Kant ise rasyonel ve evrensel bir a- * aakin@sakarya.edu.tr hakansaricam@gmail.com z- u- 16 er ueddei- mluluk l- ir arada huzurlu ve adalet eopanzano, Goldman, ve Folger, 2003). Folger (1998) Ahlaki zorunluluk alt boyutunda 8 madde, ahlaki sorumluluk alt boyutunda 6 madde, Ahlaki e- m (2) Ka- adilkik adalette bir davran n .89, .89 Orijinal ahlaki sorumluluk osorlendirmede organizasyonel adaletin yani deontik eng Deontik inin 3.65 ahlaki inin 3.49 ahlaki ve likte toplam (Beugre, 2012). einin 3.03 rn- Bulgular Madde analizi anan edir. Ar . aDFA i- u- X CFI= .94, IFI= .95, GFI= .93, AGFI= .71, and SRMR= .051). 17 M1 M2 M3 M4 .16 .56 .46 M5 .79 .17 .43 M6 Ahlaki Zorunluluk .60 .40 .44 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 M13 M14 .44 .44 .44 .44 .59 .44 Ahlaki .44 M15 M16 .44 M17 .37 Ahlaki Sorumluluk .44 .44 .44 M18 e- a- . ontik adalet u- ormu- -test ee 1980). kabul -Engel ve sd= 130, p= .00101, RMSEA= .039, CFI= .94, IFI= .95, GFI= .93, AGFI= .71, and SRMR= .051) kabul edilebi- 18 Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419-456. Bentler, P. M., ve Bonet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. Beugre, C. D. (2012). Development and Validation of a Deontic Justice Scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2163 2190. Brown, M., ve Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K. A. Bollen ve J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (s. 136-162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., ve Folger, R. (2003). Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 1019 1024. Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, ve D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 3 33). Greenwich, CT: Information Age. Folger, R., ve Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In J. Greenberg ve R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1 55). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Folger, R., Cropanzano, R., ve Goldman, B. (2005). What is the relationship between justice and morality? In J. Greenberg ve J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 215 245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Ahlak Psikolojisi ve Sosyal Ahlak Kant, I.(2002). . Etik Cogito, 41-42, 241-275. Schermelleh-Engel, K., ve Moosbrugger, H., (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74. A. A. (1996). , 232-237.
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz