Microquasars as gamma-ray sources Valentí Bosch-Ramon(1) Josep M. Paredes(1) In collaboration with: Gustavo E. Romero(2,3) & Felix Aharonian(4) (1)Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalunya, España Argentino de Radioastronomía, Villa Elisa, Buenos Aires, Argentina (3)Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas, UNLP, La Plata, Argentina (4)Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany (2)Instituto Outline: • • • • • Emissions from a microquasar. The two EGRET microquasars: LS 5039 and LSI +61 303 (3EG J1639-4702, Combi et al. (2004, A&A)). A model for the unidentified variable EGRET sources in the galactic plane. Interaction between microquasars and the ISM. Conclusions. EMISSIONS FROM A MICROQUASAR • • Donor star IR & UV (thermal) Compact jets Radio & IR & X? & ? (synchrotron & IC) Disc + corona ? X & IR therm + non therm • Wind Visible & radio (free-free) M• • Dust ? IR & mm (thermal) • Large scale ejection Radio & X Interaction with environment • LS 5039 and its microquasar nature High Resolution radio map of the nearby star LS 5039 obtained with VLBA and VLA in phased array mode at 6 cm. The presence of radio jets is the main evidence supporting its microquasar nature. 1 milliarcsec is equivalent to 3AU (~1013 cm) for a distance of 3kpc. [Paredes et al. (2000, Science)]. Orbital semi-major axis, a ~ 2.6x1012 cm •Orbital eccentricity, e ~ 0.5(?) • Stellar type: ON6.5V((f)) 31 erg/s •Lradio ~ 10 •Spectral index ~ 0.5 • • Lx ~ 1034 erg/s • X-ray photon index ~ 1.3-1.9 CGRO/EGRET field of 3EG J1824-1514 g-rays L(>100MeV)∼1035erg·s-1 Observed spectral energy distribution from the radio to the -rays. Ribó (2002, PhD thesis) EGRET candidate: LSI+61303 • • Orbital semi-major axis, a ~ 5x1012 cm Orbital eccentricity, e ~ 0.7 • Stellar type: B0 V (Be) Lradio ~ 1031-32 erg/s (v.) • Spectral index ~ 0-0.4 • Lx ~ 1034-35 erg/s (v.) • X-ray phot. Ind. ~ 1.7 • Distance ~ 2 kpc • This source presents • outbursts at radio and X-ray energies. Massi et al. (2004, A&A) Precession could explain: • the puzzling VLBI structures observed so far • shortest term variability of the associated EGRET source EGRET observations of 2CG 135+01 shows variability on short (~day) and long (~month) timescales Tavani et al. (1998, ApJ) Massi (2004, A&A) The broadband 1 keV-100 MeV spectrum remains uncertain (OSSE and COMPTEL observations were likely dominated by the QSO 0241+622 emission) Harrison et al. (2000, ApJ ) Hartman et al. (1999, ApJS) First proposed as a COS B source by Gregory & Taylor (1978, Nature) The EGRET angular resolution is sufficient to exclude the quasar as the source of gamma-ray emission Strickman et al. (1998, ApJ) (Bosch-Ramon) A model for EGRET microquasars • • • • • We consider an inhomogeneous jet with a highly relativistic leptonic population (hadrons?: Romero et al. (2003, A&A)). Leptons are assumed to dominate the radiative processes and injected following a power-law in energy. The evolution of the particles in the jet have been taken into account (adiabatic and radiative ones). Radiative losses: synchrotron effect, external (star, disk corona) inverse Compton and synchrotron self-Compton scattering. High energy emission due to IC processes in the jet: External Compton (e.g. Georganopoulos et al. (2002, A&A); Kaufman Bernadó et al. (2002, A&A)). • Synchrotron Self Compton (e.g. Atoyan & Aharonian (1999, MNRAS)). • Computed Spectral Energy Distribution of LS 5039 • • • • • • • Maximum electron Lorentz factor: max = 105 B=1G Kinetic luminosity or jet power: Lk ~ 1036erg/s LEGRET ~ 1035 erg/s B = 10 G EGRET = 2.2 ± 0.2 Bosch-Ramon & Paredes (2004a, A&A) Computed Spectral Energy Distribution of LSI+61303 Hall et al. (2003, ApJ) B = 1, 10 G −7 −8 −10 −11 2 log (Iε [photon/cm /s/MeV]) −9 Maximum electron Lorentz factor: •e max = 105 • Kinetic luminosity or jet power: L k ~ 1035 erg/s • LEGRET ~ 1035 erg/s • EGRET = 2.2 ± 0.2 • −12 −13 EGRET data model spectra: Lac(Rorb=a) Lac(Rorb=a(1−e)) Lac(Rorb=a(1+e)) 5 Bγ=10 G and γmax=10 −14 −15 −16 −17 8 8.5 9 9.5 10 log (Photon energy [eV]) Bosch-Ramon & Paredes (2004b, A&A, in press) [astro-ph/0407016] 10.5 The g-ray population in the galactic plane Log N-Log S diagram for the steady (top) and variable (bottom) sources of the GRP I: • 100 −2.92 N~S 10 N (Normalized) • 1 100 −1.66 N~S • 10 • 1 10 −8 −2 −1 100 S (x10 ph cm s ) Bosch-Ramon et al. (2004a, A&A, in press) [astro-ph/0405017] We have separated all the sources within 6° of galactic latitude in two groups: variable and non-variable sources (Nolan et al. 2003). Log N-Log S analysis for radio pulsars gives a very steep powerlaw: βrad. Puls. ~1 (Bhattacharya et al. 2003). Variable sources seem to be less concentrated to the inner spiral arms than the steady sources. High-mass microquasars have large proper motions (Ribó et al 2002): more spread in the galaxy. A canonic EGRET microquasar Computed SED of a broadband spectrum: • Lk~1036 erg/s, Γjet=1.1 & θ=10° • B=200 G, γemax=104 & p=2 40 39 IC emission seed photons radio emission star 38 37 • 36 log (εLε [erg/s] ) 35 34 sync. IC 33 • disk 32 31 30 29 corona cor. IC radio jet IC emission is dominated by SSC scattering, reaching EGRET energies. star IC sync. • disk IC 28 27 26 25 Ldisk~3x1032, Lcor~3x1032 & Lstar~5x1038 erg/s −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5 log (Photon energy [eV] ) 6 7 8 9 Bosch-Ramon et al. (2004a, A&A, in press) [astro-ph/0405017] • Low luminosities at X-rays, with harder spectrum at high-energy gamma-rays (Thomson reg.). Lradio<< Lx < LEGRET Interaction between microquasars and molecular clouds SED for a continuous microquasar at R=10 pc and three different t: 100 yr (1), 1000 yr (2), 10000 yr (3). • 33 3 synchrotron emission Bremstrahlung emission pion−decay emission 32 3 • 2 3 2 log (εLε [erg/s]) 31 1 2 • 1 30 • 29 28 1 radio 27 −12 −10 −8 −6 gamma−rays X−rays optical −4 −2 0 2 2 4 6 log (Photon energy [mec ]) Bosch-Ramon et al. (2004b, A&A, submitted) • A jet of microquasar releases (accelerate) high energy protons. These relativistic protons diffuse in the ISM up to reach a molecular cloud (D(E)). Proton-proton interactions produce g-rays and e-/e+ via pion-decay. The secondaries generate significant amounts of synchrotron radiation and Bremstrahlung. All these (extended) emission could be detected from the Earth from radio to TeV energies. Microquasars and steady g-ray sources in the galactic plane SED of a continuous microquasar (solid line) plus a typical EGRET spectrum up to 10 GeV (long-dashed line): 36 • • log (εLε [erg/s]) 35 • 34 • 100 GeV 1 GeV 33 3 4 2 5 log (Photon energy [mec ]) Bosch-Ramon et al. (2004b, A&A, submitted) For ancient sources, the g-ray peak is at EGRET energies. For molecular clouds of 105 solar masses, we obtain EGRET fluxes even at distances of several kpc. The molecular cloud is at a distance of 10 pc from the microquasar. The new generation of Cherenkov telescopes could even detect this sources at 100 GeV. Conclusions • • • • • We can reproduce, in a microquasar scenario, the observed EGRET broadband spectra and variability with reasonable parameter values. Our approach gives restrictions on the electron energy and the leptonic kinetic luminosity, showing the importance that B could have in the production of seed photons. Regarding the subset of variable galactic EGRET sources, microquasars are likely candidates to be their counterparts. Moreover, microquasars could be indirect steady sources of gamma-rays through interaction with the ISM. Next in the future, multiwavelength campaings and the new g-ray instruments will allow to unveil the nature of many gray sources, and microquasars could turn out to be a significant fraction of them.
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz