APPENDIX 1
COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS DATA SHEETS
COMBINED DATA SETS
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Prediction of Metamer Pair – 3 Combined Datasets
------------------------------------------------------------------
IDL> data_set_eval
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Minimum
13.64
-13.16
Maximum
13.58
Std Dev
2.133
Mean
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
2.700
-22.87
-8.557
Maximum
3.007
17.62
14.45
Std Dev
0.2954
3.137
2.700
Mean
DE 94:
-0.5373
0.009174
0.2160
DL :
-0.06536
0.2869
0.0000
Da :
23.20
-13.10
Db :
2.911
13.47
-8.384
4.142
13.41
-21.00
DE :
2.409
15.44
0.2226
2.696
18.03
22.30
3.412
2.696
3.018
0.3322
3.260
4.560
DL :
0.6805
-0.7536
DE :
Da :
2.367
DE 94:
Db :
1.965
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
Reject Null
Decision
Decision
DL :
P Value
P Value
0.003977
0.3262
2.754e-005
Test Statistic
Test Statistic
2.666
-4.071
Critical Value
Critical Value
1.965
-0.4507
Reject Null
DL :
1.965
Decision
1.965
Reject Null
Da :
P Value
Db :
2.110e-005
Reject Null
24.97
Test Statistic
Reject Null
7.872
Critical Value
5.364e-007
DLab :
3.994e-006
Decision
4.516
Reject Null
-4.935
P Value
1.965
2.384e-007
1.965
34.79
Test Statistic
Da :
7.872
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
0.0000
0.3498
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
13.48
23.21
-8.107
-13.04
2.225
13.41
2.939
2.697
3.240
DE 94:
0.3503
4.364
0.0000
DL :
0.4294
-13.28
DE :
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
13.65
13.78
22.72
2.087
2.970
2.818
4.017
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DE 94:
2.712
-22.80
0.2595
15.93
DL :
16.89
-8.756
2.697
-22.17
3.179
12.27
-0.2552
18.25
-0.2321
2.712
Da :
3.143
Db :
0.3208
-0.02854
Decision
0.002582
Da :
P Value
2.810
Db :
Test Statistic
1.965
Reject Null
Critical Value
DL :
Decision
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
P Value
0.01951
2.070
0.05739
0.04151
Test Statistic
1.965
-1.580
Decision
-1.737
Reject Null
1.965
P Value
1.965
0.0004421
Da :
18.32
Test Statistic
Db :
7.872
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
DLab :
Reject Null
Critical Value
DL :
0.4114
Decision
0.01387
Reject Null
2.208
P Value
-0.2242
0.04769
1.965
Test Statistic
1.965
7.979
Da :
7.872
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Std Dev
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
-13.17
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Prediction of Metamer Pair – 3 Combined Datasets
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
14.10
0.2880
13.65
23.18
2.089
Maximum
2.707
2.909
2.777
Std Dev
DE :
0.2870
4.142
DE 94:
-23.81
-9.139
Mean
0.0000
DL :
17.13
13.60
DE :
13.64
-8.568
-13.16
3.126
2.707
0.0000
2.136
14.45
13.58
0.1679
0.2084
2.997
2.700
2.700
-0.5490
24.36
0.2955
Da :
2.985
-0.5397
Db :
3.915
DL :
-22.84
DE 94:
Da :
17.62
0.01113
Reject Null
Decision
2.294
P Value
1.965
Test Statistic
DL :
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
Critical Value
Reject Null
0.08157
Reject Null
3.136
0.009147
-0.05552
2.545e-005
Db :
2.368
Decision
-4.089
P Value
1.965
1.965
Test Statistic
DL :
Critical Value
Da :
8.208e-005
Decision
1.397
24.28
Reject Null
-3.800
7.872
P Value
1.965
-8.104
-13.04
2.903e-005
1.965
13.41
-22.81
Test Statistic
Da :
15.94
0.002554
Critical Value
Db :
Decision
Maximum
2.697
16.88
2.813
DLab :
Fail to Reject
P Value
0.3510
Test Statistic
24.84
Reject Null
-0.3829
Critical Value
7.872
2.247e-005
1.965
Db :
DLab :
Std Dev
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
2.697
0.3496
0.3500
0.3507
3.178
13.48
23.22
-0.2489
2.222
2.939
DL :
-0.2380
Decision
3.242
4.365
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
Da :
P Value
DE 94:
Db :
Test Statistic
1.965
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
Critical Value
0.04548
DL :
0.05294
Decision
-1.620
Reject Null
-1.694
P Value
1.965
0.0004304
1.965
18.38
Test Statistic
Da :
7.872
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – 3 Combined Datasets
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – 3 Combined Datasets
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – 3 Combined Datasets
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – 3 Combined Datasets
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – 3 Combined Datasets
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – 3 Combined Datasets
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – 3 Combined Datasets
23 April, 1999
APPENDIX 2
COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS DATA SHEETS
ALFVIN DATA SET
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Alfvin Data
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
0.2642
0.2907
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
IDL> main_alfvin_eval
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
13.64
23.20
2.457
-8.557
-13.16
3.562
13.58
2.723
DE 94:
2.918
4.372
0.0000
0.1162
0.2226
DL :
-22.87
DE :
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
13.47
22.30
2.393
3.468
2.720
4.394
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DE 94:
-13.10
14.45
13.41
17.62
2.876
2.918
0.06516
3.807
DL :
0.2519
-8.384
0.2491
-21.00
Da :
15.44
Db :
18.03
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
2.876
0.2575
3.731
0.6519
0.1425
0.08196
0.4727
Decision
1.396
0.6882
P Value
1.969
1.071
Da :
Test Statistic
DL :
1.969
Db :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
1.969
Decision
0.3555
Da :
P Value
0.3709
Db :
Test Statistic
1.969
Reject Null
Reject Null
Critical Value
DL :
0.004228
4.617
Test Statistic
0.2047
P Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
Fail to Reject
0.001389
7.916
Critical Value
2.653
DLab :
3.019
Decision
1.969
Reject Null
1.969
P Value
Da :
2.176e-005
Db :
Test Statistic
25.39
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
7.916
Critical Value
------------------------------------------------------------------
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Minimum
13.48
-13.04
Maximum
13.41
Std Dev
2.390
Mean
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
2.875
-22.80
-8.107
Maximum
2.674
16.89
15.93
Std Dev
0.08440
3.714
2.875
Mean
DE 94:
0.8841
0.0000
DL :
-0.2434
0.5178
0.0000
Da :
23.21
-13.28
Db :
3.553
13.78
-8.756
4.328
13.65
-22.17
DE :
2.488
12.27
0.6479
2.955
18.25
22.72
3.007
2.955
3.500
0.1245
3.806
4.884
DL :
0.7875
-0.1443
DE :
Da :
DL :
1.969
4.958
0.4807
0.1421
6.557e-007
0.3156
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
Db :
Fail to Reject
-1.073
Decision
Decision
0.2454
1.969
P Value
P Value
0.6900
1.969
Test Statistic
Test Statistic
1.969
Da :
Critical Value
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
2.617e-005
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
24.97
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
7.916
Critical Value
0.2508
DLab :
0.0004059
Decision
3.387
Reject Null
-0.6729
P Value
1.969
0.008423
1.969
11.96
Test Statistic
Da :
7.916
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
------------------------------------------------------------------
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Alfvin Data
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Minimum
13.65
14.10
-13.17
Maximum
2.475
Std Dev
2.941
-23.81
-9.139
Mean
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
2.814
17.13
13.60
Maximum
0.1465
3.819
2.941
Std Dev
DE 94:
0.2477
Mean
DL :
-0.1319
0.0000
0.0000
Da :
0.4037
-13.16
Db :
24.36
13.64
-8.568
3.602
13.58
-22.84
4.563
2.458
14.45
DE :
2.918
17.62
0.2952
2.704
2.918
23.18
0.1163
3.804
3.559
0.2475
4.373
DL :
0.2648
DE :
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
Fail to Reject
DL :
1.969
0.8155
0.2078
Fail to Reject
Decision
Decision
0.2573
P Value
P Value
0.6526
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
Test Statistic
Test Statistic
1.969
0.2862
0.1065
Critical Value
Critical Value
1.249
DL :
-0.5653
Decision
1.969
Fail to Reject
1.969
0.4901
P Value
Da :
7.916
Test Statistic
Db :
Decision
2.425
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
P Value
DLab :
0.1278
Decision
0.08567
Fail to Reject
1.372
P Value
1.139
0.1927
1.969
Test Statistic
1.969
4.763
Da :
7.916
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
-13.04
Maximum
13.48
Std Dev
13.41
Mean
2.390
0.0000
2.874
-22.81
-8.104
0.5178
2.674
16.88
15.94
23.22
0.08492
3.714
2.874
3.554
0.8922
4.330
DL :
-0.2508
DE :
Da :
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
Db :
0.3145
Decision
0.4837
0.1349
5.364e-007
P Value
5.003
Test Statistic
1.969
-1.106
Critical Value
DL :
1.969
2.170e-005
Fail to Reject
1.969
25.39
Test Statistic
Da :
7.916
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Alvin Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Alvin Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Alvin Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Alvin Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Alvin Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Alvin Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Alvin Data Set
23 April, 1999
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Cyan Print Selection --
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
-4.220
-3.355
0.4904
0.6010
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
1.511
11.30
11.86
10.04
2.856
3.156
3.105
2.934
3.538
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
DE :
1.278
2.726
DE 94:
DL :
0.9965
-0.9718
0.5838
0.8730
Da :
11.14
12.06
Db :
2.826
3.144
-4.237
2.992
3.618
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
-3.047
DE 94:
1.509
11.23
10.34
3.105
3.095
-3.442
1.177
2.712
11.09
DL :
1.378
-0.9532
3.095
Da :
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
-3.396
Db :
0.04482
Decision
1.794
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
DL :
0.06421
0.006258
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
1.594
-2.774
Decision
0.05736
2.101
P Value
1.658
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
10.79
Test Statistic
0.03693
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
9.717
Critical Value
Reject Null
DLab :
0.01997
Decision
0.007173
Reject Null
2.214
P Value
-2.710
0.04315
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
10.23
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
0.7499
0.9734
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
11.31
11.50
2.782
3.042
2.792
3.339
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
DE :
-4.128
DE 94:
2.198
0.6519
9.246
0.05455
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
-3.559
3.095
-3.421
1.197
2.717
1.686
11.11
DL :
0.2890
-0.3020
2.101
0.2016
3.095
Da :
1.127
11.30
-3.316
-5.236
Db :
12.78
11.30
2.881
3.111
10.71
-0.01845
Decision
3.193
3.111
3.264
1.328
2.723
P Value
4.134
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
1.656
-1.979
DE 94:
Da :
Test Statistic
DL :
0.3242
-2.734
Db :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
0.4636
-0.8562
Decision
0.03960
2.101
2.101
P Value
1.861
Da :
Test Statistic
2.101
Db :
Critical Value
DL :
Reject Null
3.660
Test Statistic
0.3347
P Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
9.717
Critical Value
0.008122
DLab :
9.537e-006
Decision
2.651
Reject Null
-5.745
P Value
2.101
0.0002603
2.101
35.14
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
0.4399
0.4884
-3.821
11.41
11.55
1.558
2.861
3.137
9.617
2.862
3.110
-3.994
1.336
2.728
-3.303
DL :
0.5692
-0.7881
11.30
Da :
3.110
Db :
DE 94:
3.436
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
0.4905
0.6016
DE :
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
11.30
11.86
2.856
3.156
2.935
3.538
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
-4.220
DE 94:
-3.395
-3.355
1.512
11.23
1.278
10.03
3.105
DL :
3.105
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
2.725
0.03873
0.9975
Decision
1.873
-0.9724
P Value
2.101
Da :
Test Statistic
DL :
Db :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
0.1876
0.01812
Decision
0.04482
0.9094
-2.263
P Value
1.794
2.101
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
Fail to Reject
Decision
9.717
8.838
Test Statistic
0.06455
P Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
0.3406
P Value
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Maximum
0.05463
Test Statistic
DLab :
0.06401
Decision
0.006242
Reject Null
1.595
P Value
-2.775
0.03685
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
10.80
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Std Dev
0.7574
0.9854
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
11.31
11.51
-4.138
2.781
3.041
2.208
2.791
3.337
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
9.235
DE 94:
3.095
0.2099
-3.548
1.196
2.717
Decision
-3.421
DL :
0.2786
-0.2913
P Value
1.685
0.3301
11.11
Da :
Test Statistic
2.101
0.4470
-0.8257
3.095
Db :
Critical Value
DL :
2.101
2.101
3.608
Fail to Reject
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Cyan Transparency Selection --
Maximum
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
0.2226
DE :
Mean
2.293
Std Dev
10.36
Maximum
1.169
Minimum
DL :
2.101
2.365
0.01472
0.7728
3.880
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
9.115
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
2.138
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
3.316
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DE 94:
-1.672
0.1231
7.857
6.948
1.813
1.648
DL :
1.343
-1.759
2.631
2.273
Da :
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
-1.980
Db :
-5.764
4.835
-4.660
5.184
1.679
-2.212
1.686
0.5939
5.148
0.9151
DL :
8.109
-1.431
1.679
4.044
2.334
8.981
0.5619
-0.6719
1.686
Da :
0.07031
Test Statistic
2.361
Db :
Decision
Decision
P Value
1.541
Reject Null
Reject Null
Reject Null
P Value
Test Statistic
2.101
0.01165
0.004122
Critical Value
Critical Value
DL :
2.479
Decision
-2.968
Reject Null
2.101
P Value
2.101
0.02054
Da :
Test Statistic
Db :
12.98
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
DLab :
0.1368
Decision
0.1539
Fail to Reject
1.049
P Value
-1.129
0.3813
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
3.273
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Minimum
-1.977
Maximum
6.527
Std Dev
4.836
Mean
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Minimum
1.518
0.5503
1.679
-2.860
-4.378
0.8031
2.297
7.471
5.398
8.494
0.5967
2.339
1.679
1.964
-0.3873
3.325
------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum
1.130
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
12.66
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
2.846
DL :
-0.09346
DE :
5.946
Da :
DE :
Db :
DE 94:
-8.616
0.6396
5.450
-0.6044
-1.435
1.690
9.817
0.8610
9.101
1.690
2.047
1.160
2.363
3.599
DL :
2.171
-4.802
DE 94:
Da :
Decision
Db :
P Value
Fail to Reject
Test Statistic
0.06942
Critical Value
1.549
DL :
2.101
Decision
Reject Null
0.003923
P Value
2.990
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
Test Statistic
2.101
0.4318
0.2611
Critical Value
-0.1742
-0.6528
DL :
2.101
Decision
2.101
Fail to Reject
Da :
0.2309
P Value
Db :
Test Statistic
Reject Null
4.770
Reject Null
9.717
Critical Value
0.0004153
DLab :
5.960e-008
Decision
4.005
Reject Null
-8.380
P Value
2.101
3.278e-006
2.101
73.19
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
-1.672
Db :
Da :
DL :
1.356
-3.188
1.084
2.366
1.689
1.689
9.014
2.524
5.366
-7.138
-1.508
1.153
2.277
-5.765
8.302
11.13
5.184
-1.431
1.897
2.443
4.044
2.986
4.654
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
DE :
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
DE 94:
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
0.7726
1.169
1.686
8.979
7.856
10.36
1.686
1.813
2.293
0.9150
2.360
2.631
3.880
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
1.342
-1.759
DE 94:
Da :
-1.415
Db :
Decision
Reject Null
Reject Null
Reject Null
P Value
0.005952
Test Statistic
2.797
Critical Value
2.101
Decision
DL :
P Value
0.01473
Test Statistic
2.365
Critical Value
2.101
0.01119
1.717e-005
Reject Null
DL :
2.499
-5.464
Decision
2.101
35.07
Reject Null
2.101
9.717
P Value
Da :
-4.366
-1.978
Fail to Reject
0.0002632
Db :
4.834
-2.871
0.06986
Test Statistic
Reject Null
5.408
1.545
Critical Value
Reject Null
Maximum
1.679
7.461
2.101
DLab :
0.01166
Decision
0.004122
Reject Null
2.479
P Value
-2.968
0.02054
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
12.98
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Std Dev
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
1.679
0.5606
0.8187
0.5952
2.339
6.518
8.481
-0.3758
Decision
1.515
1.962
DL :
-0.1040
P Value
2.297
3.324
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
Da :
Test Statistic
DE 94:
Db :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
DL :
0.4243
0.2672
Decision
-0.1938
Fail to Reject
-0.6334
0.2299
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
4.783
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
------------------------------------------------------------------
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Magenta Print Selection --
------------------------------------------------------------------
5.598
-3.010
Minimum
2.942
Maximum
1.249
Std Dev
1.714
-8.249
-3.669
Mean
2.095
3.592
9.543
Minimum
DE :
-0.02610
2.782
1.714
Maximum
DE 94:
2.159
Std Dev
DL :
-0.2861
Mean
0.7626
Da :
0.6930
-2.885
Db :
0.7645
4.939
-4.191
12.90
3.032
-6.777
2.626
1.077
9.126
3.915
1.708
5.040
1.342
2.255
1.708
11.66
0.07493
2.766
2.256
1.654
4.055
DL :
1.192
DE :
Da :
0.4739
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
Db :
-0.06638
0.3297
0.001391
Decision
3.462
P Value
2.101
-0.4483
Test Statistic
DL :
2.101
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
2.101
Decision
0.4252
Da :
P Value
0.1913
Db :
Test Statistic
2.101
Reject Null
Critical Value
DL :
Fail to Reject
0.002452
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
0.03830
22.30
Test Statistic
0.008379
9.717
Critical Value
2.637
DLab :
1.879
Decision
2.101
Reject Null
2.101
P Value
Da :
0.0001712
Db :
Test Statistic
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
37.96
------------------------------------------------------------------
9.717
Critical Value
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
DLab :
------------------------------------------------------------------
5.534
-2.836
Minimum
3.086
Maximum
1.239
Std Dev
1.708
Mean
2.104
Minimum
DE :
0.1256
Maximum
DE 94:
-8.416
-3.427
Std Dev
DL :
3.439
9.925
Mean
0.9115
2.785
1.708
0.5528
-3.183
2.416
0.7448
5.801
-0.4270
13.26
2.780
Da :
2.705
1.154
Db :
4.043
1.716
-7.610
-2.613
1.214
2.400
4.156
10.24
13.07
-0.1873
2.765
1.716
2.485
2.949
4.425
DL :
0.3080
DE :
Da :
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
Db :
0.3761
Decision
0.3206
P Value
2.101
0.2562
0.0006010
Test Statistic
DL :
3.839
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
-0.6683
Decision
0.3200
2.101
P Value
-0.4758
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
0.001616
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
24.43
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
0.3166
DLab :
6.032e-005
Decision
4.879
Reject Null
0.4855
P Value
2.101
7.033e-006
2.101
64.99
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
------------------------------------------------------------------
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
6.133
-3.066
Minimum
2.903
Maximum
1.312
Std Dev
1.716
Mean
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
2.242
Maximum
-0.07010
Std Dev
DE 94:
-9.098
-2.581
Mean
DL :
2.748
10.52
0.9259
0.6909
2.786
1.716
1.746
-3.010
3.155
14.17
5.590
-1.147
2.846
2.943
Da :
4.543
1.247
Db :
DE :
1.714
-8.235
-3.678
0.7574
2.095
3.605
9.535
12.88
-0.02577
2.782
1.714
2.623
2.151
3.912
DL :
-0.2727
DE :
Da :
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
Db :
0.4303
Decision
-0.1780
P Value
2.101
0.04483
3.737e-005
Test Statistic
DL :
5.101
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
-1.794
Decision
0.4742
2.101
P Value
-0.06556
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
9.717
36.75
0.0002043
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
Decision
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
Critical Value
0.3371
P Value
DLab :
0.001434
Decision
3.448
Reject Null
-0.4273
P Value
2.101
0.002450
2.101
22.31
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
-2.833
Maximum
5.538
Std Dev
3.088
Mean
1.240
0.5524
1.708
-8.426
-3.420
0.7524
2.105
3.429
9.932
13.27
0.1278
2.785
1.708
2.708
2.424
4.047
DL :
-0.4373
DE :
Da :
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
Db :
0.3740
Decision
0.3261
0.2512
0.0005859
P Value
3.851
Test Statistic
2.101
-0.6844
Critical Value
DL :
2.101
0.001616
Fail to Reject
2.101
24.43
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Magenta Transparency Selection --
Maximum
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
0.6537
DE :
4.323
Mean
3.751
Std Dev
12.19
Maximum
0.4723
0.9892
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
12.51
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
3.632
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
4.418
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
-8.366
-6.340
-9.257
5.607
8.184
9.376
-1.385
2.820
3.549
3.405
-0.5553
2.916
DL :
0.04670
3.549
Da :
2.887
Db :
DE 94:
-5.880
0.4604
-8.179
-9.273
8.874
9.349
5.847
3.299
3.526
2.868
-1.432
2.806
3.526
DL :
0.3114
-0.02610
2.916
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.05311
P Value
-1.701
Test Statistic
2.101
Critical Value
Decision
DL :
P Value
-1.770
Fail to Reject
Test Statistic
2.101
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
0.04684
Critical Value
0.4716
0.2365
DL :
0.07218
-0.7330
Decision
2.101
Fail to Reject
2.101
0.2594
P Value
Da :
Test Statistic
Db :
4.421
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
DLab :
0.4866
Decision
0.3172
Reject Null
0.4837
P Value
-0.03396
0.01914
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
13.25
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Maximum
Minimum
0.6479
DE :
Mean
3.664
Std Dev
13.34
Maximum
1.136
Minimum
0.2728
-1.406
2.832
3.525
3.525
5.138
9.216
3.321
-9.051
-5.557
-9.247
0.6697
4.426
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
10.91
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
3.663
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
4.421
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
-0.4715
9.362
Da :
2.899
-9.250
Db :
2.887
3.481
-7.704
-6.684
DE 94:
3.565
6.113
6.904
0.4063
-1.358
2.797
3.565
9.358
-1.319
2.893
DL :
0.6081
2.935
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
0.04958
Fail to Reject
Decision
-1.739
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
DL :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.05701
P Value
-1.661
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
Test Statistic
2.101
0.2387
0.3636
Critical Value
0.3543
DL :
-0.7257
Decision
2.101
Reject Null
2.101
P Value
Da :
0.02375
Db :
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
12.42
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
0.1779
DLab :
0.03817
Decision
0.9476
Fail to Reject
-1.880
0.3332
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
3.673
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Maximum
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
0.9846
DE :
4.309
Mean
3.829
Std Dev
11.88
Maximum
3.560
5.378
7.394
3.475
-8.629
-6.747
-9.231
0.3766
0.8919
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
12.18
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
3.751
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
4.324
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
-1.345
2.826
3.560
9.393
-1.144
2.948
DL :
-0.2061
2.881
Da :
DE 94:
-9.256
Db :
0.4715
-8.354
-6.349
9.375
5.619
8.177
3.405
-1.384
2.819
3.549
2.915
-0.5629
3.549
DL :
0.05855
2.887
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
0.05851
Fail to Reject
Decision
-1.646
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
DL :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.05314
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
P Value
-1.700
0.3771
0.06857
Test Statistic
2.101
-1.556
Critical Value
-0.3178
DL :
2.101
Decision
2.101
Fail to Reject
Da :
0.2955
P Value
Db :
9.717
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
Minimum
4.030
Fail to Reject
Maximum
1.131
-9.245
Critical Value
0.4644
Std Dev
13.35
3.323
-9.058
-5.553
DLab :
0.2335
Decision
0.09053
Fail to Reject
-0.7430
0.2613
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
4.398
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
3.664
3.525
5.132
9.221
0.6715
4.427
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
-1.404
2.832
3.525
9.360
0.2769
2.899
DL :
-0.4780
2.887
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.04977
P Value
-1.737
Test Statistic
2.101
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
DL :
0.2357
Decision
0.3616
Reject Null
0.3597
P Value
-0.7358
0.02371
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
12.43
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
------------------------------------------------------------------
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Yellow Print Selection --
------------------------------------------------------------------
11.41
-10.96
Minimum
5.651
Maximum
2.449
Std Dev
3.560
Mean
3.348
Minimum
DE :
-0.9642
Maximum
DE 94:
-11.23
-0.03010
Std Dev
DL :
4.884
6.914
Mean
0.6626
4.451
3.560
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.3168
-10.75
2.826
0.6470
11.11
-0.9928
16.24
5.803
Da :
3.538
2.337
Db :
5.692
3.549
-9.362
-0.2440
2.139
3.389
6.427
6.736
14.80
-0.7866
4.344
3.549
2.933
2.635
5.780
DL :
0.7646
DE :
Da :
0.1265
DE 94:
Db :
-1.181
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
DL :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.1734
0.1719
2.861e-006
P Value
-0.9660
6.334
Test Statistic
2.101
-0.9722
Critical Value
DL :
2.101
Decision
2.101
Reject Null
Da :
P Value
Db :
4.190e-005
Reject Null
48.57
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
0.2264
DLab :
7.093e-006
Decision
5.886
Reject Null
0.7673
P Value
2.101
0.0001805
2.101
37.59
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Minimum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
1.448
0.5768
15.31
-10.74
3.131
11.15
5.751
5.812
DE :
2.348
2.891
3.549
0.07209
17.09
3.407
7.010
3.274
-0.7764
3.549
7.183
2.931
DE :
DL :
-0.06314
DE 94:
Da :
1.483
-11.11
Db :
11.73
5.518
-11.02
2.356
2.279
3.565
5.091
9.042
4.038
-1.111
4.455
3.565
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
DL :
5.051
-10.03
-0.7555
5.630
Da :
4.315
Db :
0.1765
Decision
-0.9536
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
DL :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.09554
P Value
-1.359
1.788e-006
Test Statistic
2.101
6.567
Critical Value
DL :
-0.06378
Fail to Reject
2.101
0.4749
2.101
Decision
Da :
Reject Null
Db :
P Value
Fail to Reject
4.780e-005
Reject Null
47.49
Test Statistic
0.2347
9.717
Critical Value
0.0000
DLab :
11.29
Reject Null
Decision
-0.7392
0.0000
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
162.2
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Minimum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
0.8167
1.563
11.59
16.92
2.395
1.088
-11.06
3.573
5.573
3.626
3.564
4.409
7.886
6.340
DE 94:
-1.053
4.427
3.564
DE :
0.3185
3.856
0.6603
DL :
-1.465
11.40
Da :
16.21
-10.96
Db :
2.448
5.651
-11.18
-0.03693
3.524
3.560
4.917
6.908
3.348
-0.9639
4.448
3.560
5.688
2.820
DE :
DL :
-0.9531
DE 94:
Da :
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
-11.59
Db :
0.1071
Decision
-1.288
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
DL :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.1266
0.08312
5.960e-008
P Value
-1.180
8.667
Test Statistic
2.101
-1.443
Critical Value
DL :
2.101
Decision
2.101
Reject Null
Da :
P Value
Db :
100.7
4.172e-007
Reject Null
9.717
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
Minimum
Critical Value
0.1813
Maximum
DLab :
2.980e-006
Decision
6.319
Reject Null
-0.9341
P Value
2.101
4.530e-005
2.101
47.93
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
-10.74
0.5798
11.15
1.449
5.813
15.32
2.348
3.131
3.549
0.08115
5.755
3.410
7.018
DE :
-0.7753
3.549
DE 94:
DL :
2.940
-10.04
-0.06668
5.626
Da :
4.315
Db :
Decision
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
P Value
0.1768
Test Statistic
-0.9523
Critical Value
2.101
Fail to Reject
DL :
0.4735
1.729e-006
Decision
6.586
Reject Null
-0.06736
P Value
2.101
4.590e-005
2.101
47.83
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Yellow Transparency Selection --
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Maximum
2.142
Minimum
DE :
Mean
2.531
Std Dev
11.86
Maximum
1.630
Minimum
1.482
0.2242
4.400
2.063
2.063
6.731
3.982
3.122
-11.58
-0.2610
-3.407
0.9145
4.437
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
10.90
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
2.238
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
4.605
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
0.1978
3.938
Da :
0.9559
-3.398
Db :
2.318
3.099
-10.57
0.1633
DE 94:
2.053
6.955
4.465
1.144
0.2133
4.199
2.053
3.897
1.929
0.8925
DL :
0.5962
2.427
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
0.3207
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.4737
P Value
2.101
0.4234
5.543e-006
Test Statistic
DL :
6.010
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
0.1960
Decision
0.3280
2.101
P Value
0.4528
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
3.093e-005
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
51.11
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
0.2719
DLab :
1.788e-007
Decision
7.709
Reject Null
0.6188
P Value
2.101
7.749e-007
2.101
90.99
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Maximum
2.315
Minimum
DE :
Mean
2.335
Std Dev
11.63
Maximum
2.226
Minimum
3.101
0.3518
-3.394
1.249
4.608
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
11.47
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
2.315
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
4.771
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
2.052
4.640
3.999
0.2160
2.052
0.8901
2.121
2.470
DL :
-0.08722
DE 94:
Da :
1.246
-3.447
Db :
3.958
3.101
-11.11
0.3555
0.8699
2.070
7.095
4.330
2.481
0.1966
4.378
2.070
DE 94:
DL :
2.085
-11.30
0.5847
6.254
Da :
4.205
Db :
0.3260
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.4588
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
DL :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.3419
P Value
0.4139
Test Statistic
2.101
5.960e-008
Critical Value
DL :
8.558
Fail to Reject
-0.09040
0.4645
2.101
Decision
2.101
Reject Null
Da :
P Value
Db :
2.980e-007
Fail to Reject
105.2
Test Statistic
Reject Null
9.717
Critical Value
0.2839
DLab :
0.0000
Decision
9.353
Reject Null
0.5821
P Value
2.101
1.192e-007
2.101
120.3
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Maximum
1.631
Minimum
DE :
Mean
2.573
Std Dev
12.11
Maximum
1.693
Minimum
3.122
-0.1789
-3.420
0.9640
4.409
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
11.79
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
2.516
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
4.437
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
2.068
3.932
3.980
0.2197
2.068
0.9502
1.552
2.330
DL :
-0.08163
DE 94:
Da :
0.9111
-3.406
Db :
3.930
3.122
-11.51
-0.2688
0.9551
2.063
6.769
3.975
2.317
0.2245
4.392
2.063
DE 94:
DL :
1.474
-11.82
0.2444
6.413
Da :
4.383
Db :
0.3244
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.4631
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
DL :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.3205
P Value
0.4743
Test Statistic
2.101
1.609e-006
Critical Value
DL :
6.629
Fail to Reject
-0.08118
0.4681
2.101
Decision
2.101
Reject Null
Da :
58.61
P Value
Db :
9.717
1.341e-005
Reject Null
Minimum
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
Maximum
2.235
Critical Value
0.4055
Std Dev
11.64
DLab :
5.901e-006
Decision
5.977
Reject Null
0.2426
P Value
2.101
3.219e-005
2.101
50.77
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
2.334
1.253
4.613
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
-3.393
3.999
3.102
0.3605
0.8894
2.052
4.648
2.472
0.2169
2.052
DE 94:
DL :
2.130
-11.31
-0.09075
6.251
Da :
4.205
Db :
Decision
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
P Value
0.3253
Test Statistic
0.4606
Critical Value
2.101
Fail to Reject
DL :
0.4630
5.960e-008
Decision
8.594
Reject Null
-0.09406
P Value
2.101
2.980e-007
2.101
106.1
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
------------------------------------------------------------------
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Gray Print Selection --
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
-2.128
Maximum
12.67
-0.9710
Std Dev
6.679
-2.405
Mean
2.592
4.855
Minimum
2.001
17.62
Maximum
DE :
2.691
2.001
Std Dev
DE 94:
0.3072
4.057
Mean
DL :
1.961
0.9570
0.6277
0.9878
Da :
0.7460
-2.138
Db :
19.06
12.78
-0.9974
3.983
6.603
-1.675
3.279
2.523
4.849
1.127
1.989
18.03
19.44
3.023
1.989
3.968
0.2829
3.992
3.691
DL :
2.666
0.9616
DE :
Da :
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
Db :
0.2559
Decision
0.6693
0.02469
0.002091
P Value
2.101
3.278
Test Statistic
DL :
2.107
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
2.101
Decision
0.2716
2.101
P Value
0.6197
Da :
Test Statistic
2.101
Db :
Critical Value
DL :
Reject Null
Reject Null
0.008621
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Reject Null
0.002237
16.51
Test Statistic
0.004661
9.717
Critical Value
3.247
DLab :
2.911
Decision
2.101
Reject Null
2.101
P Value
Da :
0.002297
Db :
Test Statistic
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
22.63
------------------------------------------------------------------
9.717
Critical Value
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
DLab :
------------------------------------------------------------------
-2.114
Minimum
11.65
Maximum
6.622
-2.908
-0.3787
Std Dev
2.370
5.509
Mean
1.989
16.89
Minimum
2.725
1.989
Maximum
DE :
0.3054
4.009
Std Dev
DE 94:
1.591
Mean
DL :
1.460
0.9333
0.9085
Da :
1.022
-2.148
Db :
18.47
13.78
-0.7827
3.825
6.705
-1.750
3.379
2.752
4.835
1.090
2.007
18.25
19.56
3.010
2.007
4.001
0.2994
4.056
3.653
DL :
2.589
0.9883
DE :
Da :
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
Db :
0.2559
Decision
0.6693
P Value
2.101
0.06493
1.848e-005
Test Statistic
DL :
5.430
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
1.587
Decision
0.2619
2.101
P Value
0.6502
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
0.0003424
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
33.38
Test Statistic
Reject Null
9.717
Critical Value
0.006146
DLab :
0.0009689
Decision
3.625
Reject Null
2.782
P Value
2.101
0.001186
2.101
26.08
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
------------------------------------------------------------------
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Minimum
12.35
-2.115
Maximum
6.721
-2.948
-0.3986
Std Dev
2.531
5.386
Mean
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
2.005
17.13
Maximum
2.668
2.005
Std Dev
0.3276
4.070
Mean
DE 94:
1.469
0.9076
DL :
1.420
0.9676
0.6259
Da :
18.62
-2.128
Db :
3.879
12.66
-0.9749
3.309
6.679
-2.399
DE :
2.591
4.852
0.7438
2.001
17.62
19.06
2.693
2.001
3.983
0.3073
4.056
3.281
DL :
1.968
0.9534
DE :
Da :
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
Db :
0.2428
Decision
0.7120
P Value
2.101
0.07282
2.778e-005
Test Statistic
DL :
5.239
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
1.521
Decision
0.2558
2.101
P Value
0.6696
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
9.717
31.47
0.0004655
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
Decision
Test Statistic
Reject Null
Reject Null
Critical Value
0.02431
P Value
DLab :
0.002152
Decision
3.265
Reject Null
2.115
P Value
2.101
0.008703
2.101
16.46
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
-2.114
Maximum
11.64
Std Dev
6.622
-2.918
-0.3680
Mean
2.368
5.519
0.9280
1.989
16.88
1.016
2.728
1.989
18.46
0.3056
4.009
3.823
1.602
3.382
DL :
1.450
DE :
Da :
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
Db :
0.2558
Decision
0.6696
0.06617
1.711e-005
P Value
5.467
Test Statistic
2.101
1.576
Critical Value
DL :
2.101
0.0003231
Fail to Reject
2.101
33.74
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Gray Transparency Selection --
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
-0.6967
-3.727
-1.911
0.2642
0.2907
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
10.29
10.35
2.386
2.139
2.498
DE 94:
4.406
2.927
0.7552
2.538
0.8178
1.031
1.835
10.12
DL :
1.563
-0.9699
2.538
-2.112
Da :
3.241
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
9.876
Db :
-2.778
-1.166
3.123
4.056
Decision
Fail to Reject
P Value
0.04668
Test Statistic
1.772
Critical Value
2.101
DL :
Reject Null
Decision
0.01080
Fail to Reject
0.0007964
0.002385
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Reject Null
3.713
-2.515
22.44
Test Statistic
2.101
9.717
Critical Value
2.101
DLab :
Da :
Decision
Db :
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
P Value
Reject Null
P Value
0.08690
0.4783
0.001605
0.006868
DE :
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
2.528
2.528
1.845
9.953
9.998
0.8214
2.144
2.177
DL :
1.156
-0.02138
2.804
3.083
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
1.416
Test Statistic
2.101
2.730
-0.05516
Critical Value
2.101
DL :
2.101
24.47
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
0.8255
1.854
2.528
2.528
3.247
3.430
9.879
-2.473
-2.108
1.122
1.302
0.2904
10.00
10.10
DL :
0.3853
2.012
1.990
Da :
2.738
3.030
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
DE :
Db :
DE 94:
-5.125
0.6798
0.6992
10.30
0.01562
10.80
11.02
2.544
5.124
0.5049
2.475
2.653
2.544
3.562
4.203
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
1.183
1.825
DE 94:
DL :
2.274
-2.433
-1.766
Da :
0.08586
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
-2.005
Db :
0.2318
Decision
1.423
0.1884
P Value
2.101
0.7489
Test Statistic
DL :
0.9060
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
2.101
Decision
0.02887
2.101
P Value
2.027
Da :
Test Statistic
2.101
Db :
Critical Value
DL :
Reject Null
10.98
Test Statistic
0.03503
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
9.717
Critical Value
2.205e-006
DLab :
1.848e-005
Decision
5.431
Reject Null
-6.459
P Value
2.101
4.441e-005
2.101
48.09
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
2.542
4.229
1.290
10.25
-4.481
-1.806
0.6116
0.7167
2.542
10.59
10.70
1.141
1.836
2.413
2.538
DL :
1.408
-1.738
3.125
3.485
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
DE :
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
0.2664
0.2952
-3.732
10.29
10.35
-0.6873
2.388
2.500
2.135
2.930
3.245
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
4.414
DE 94:
2.538
-1.911
1.032
1.835
10.12
DL :
1.572
-0.9742
2.538
Da :
-0.8668
Db :
0.03305
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
Decision
1.956
0.001812
0.0001245
P Value
2.101
3.343
-4.549
Test Statistic
DL :
2.101
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
2.101
Decision
0.04667
Da :
P Value
1.772
Db :
Test Statistic
2.101
Reject Null
Critical Value
DL :
0.01055
Reject Null
Decision
9.717
24.38
0.001633
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Reject Null
0.0007602
Decision
Reject Null
3.734
Reject Null
Minimum
P Value
Test Statistic
-2.527
P Value
Maximum
0.03459
Critical Value
2.101
0.002288
Std Dev
-2.461
-2.108
Test Statistic
DLab :
2.101
22.65
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
9.878
-2.014
1.110
1.288
3.441
10.00
10.11
2.528
3.238
2.010
1.987
2.528
2.739
3.031
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
0.8251
1.854
DE 94:
DL :
0.3014
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
0.3766
0.08594
Da :
0.2236
Db :
1.423
0.1938
Decision
0.7772
P Value
2.101
0.8855
Test Statistic
2.101
Critical Value
DL :
2.101
11.03
Fail to Reject
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Red Print Selection --
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
DL :
0.3680
0.1147
-1.059
2.452
2.249
2.249
5.801
4.041
2.164
-8.385
-8.534
0.7117
1.115
Da :
8.936
12.52
-8.404
Db :
1.904
2.837
-8.384
2.094
3.520
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
DE :
2.188
-2.381
DE 94:
4.339
0.3578
0.6744
2.228
6.434
8.816
12.11
2.228
1.919
2.914
-1.002
2.307
2.115
3.634
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
1.329
0.3336
DE 94:
Da :
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
-3.695
Db :
0.02748
Decision
-2.052
0.4337
P Value
2.101
0.2606
Test Statistic
DL :
0.1693
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
0.6543
Decision
0.03286
2.101
P Value
-1.960
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
0.008551
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
16.54
Test Statistic
Reject Null
9.717
Critical Value
0.3179
DLab :
0.01090
Decision
2.511
Reject Null
0.4819
P Value
2.101
0.0005503
2.101
30.46
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Minimum
-7.250
-8.655
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
-0.9908
2.314
2.227
2.227
5.283
4.554
2.197
-3.475
-8.107
-8.391
0.6941
1.228
0.5765
8.767
12.17
DL :
0.1287
1.842
Da :
2.092
Db :
DE 94:
2.705
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
2.112
-3.281
3.567
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
4.000
DE :
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
2.262
6.259
0.6174
0.9835
2.262
9.001
11.76
-1.134
2.445
1.925
2.749
0.4314
2.163
3.543
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
0.8518
DE 94:
Da :
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
Db :
0.03416
Decision
-1.939
0.2070
P Value
2.101
0.4056
Test Statistic
DL :
0.8363
Critical Value
Reject Null
0.2425
Decision
0.02118
2.101
P Value
-2.185
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
0.003174
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
21.04
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
0.2491
DLab :
0.07309
Decision
1.519
Reject Null
0.6914
P Value
2.101
0.0008149
2.101
28.17
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
0.7089
0.8325
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
9.000
12.53
1.879
2.730
2.134
3.507
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
-8.043
-4.299
-8.599
3.745
2.147
-1.091
5.166
2.258
DL :
2.258
DE :
-8.534
2.449
DE 94:
-8.396
-0.2844
0.6934
2.164
-3.648
0.004395
1.137
4.031
8.936
2.249
5.831
Da :
12.51
2.249
1.906
-1.058
2.448
Db :
2.843
0.1048
2.093
DL :
0.4088
Decision
3.518
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
P Value
-2.106
Test Statistic
2.101
Critical Value
DL :
Decision
Fail to Reject
P Value
0.02752
Test Statistic
-2.052
0.4973
Critical Value
2.101
0.3094
0.02474
DL :
-0.5063
0.006773
Decision
2.101
Reject Null
2.101
P Value
Da :
0.02282
Db :
9.717
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
Minimum
Decision
12.58
Fail to Reject
Maximum
-8.104
-8.388
Reject Null
Critical Value
0.4394
Std Dev
2.199
-3.479
P Value
DLab :
0.2380
Decision
0.1546
Reject Null
0.7280
P Value
2.101
0.008223
2.101
16.71
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
4.555
0.6918
1.227
2.227
5.278
8.765
12.17
2.227
1.841
2.704
-0.9885
2.314
2.092
3.567
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
0.5784
DE 94:
DL :
0.1243
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
Da :
0.03445
Db :
0.2062
Decision
-1.935
0.4087
P Value
0.8390
Test Statistic
2.101
0.2342
Critical Value
DL :
2.101
0.003212
Fail to Reject
2.101
20.98
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Red Transparency Selection --
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
0.4012
0.9641
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
5.953
9.861
1.767
-8.557
-5.589
3.140
2.285
2.405
DE 94:
2.485
4.751
0.2832
-0.5415
0.5165
DL :
DE :
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
5.906
9.710
1.733
3.020
2.363
4.607
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DE 94:
-5.580
-5.577
2.223
4.825
2.460
8.295
-0.5743
2.485
DL :
3.447
-8.063
0.6526
-5.099
-0.7895
5.601
Da :
7.623
Db :
2.460
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
3.152
0.1774
0.6388
Decision
-0.9497
-0.1419
P Value
2.101
Da :
Test Statistic
DL :
0.1867
Db :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
0.2100
Decision
0.1611
0.8252
-0.9129
P Value
-1.018
2.101
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
13.48
Test Statistic
0.01806
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
DLab :
0.4369
Decision
0.1943
Reject Null
0.8834
P Value
-0.1611
0.01755
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
13.59
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
DL :
-0.1575
-0.03912
-0.5736
3.204
2.458
6.973
5.657
-7.920
-5.577
0.5728
1.211
Da :
6.000
9.506
-5.598
Db :
1.697
2.980
-8.756
2.362
4.603
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
DE :
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
DE 94:
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
0.5668
1.043
2.326
-5.076
5.956
9.702
3.735
1.743
2.999
2.503
8.648
2.570
4.867
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
2.503
DE 94:
-0.5217
3.412
2.223
DL :
1.099
-1.463
2.458
Da :
-5.985
Db :
Decision
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
P Value
-1.017
Test Statistic
2.101
Critical Value
DL :
Decision
Fail to Reject
P Value
0.1879
0.4824
Test Statistic
-0.9083
0.4164
Critical Value
2.101
-0.2143
-0.04468
0.1613
DL :
2.101
Decision
2.101
Fail to Reject
Da :
0.2327
P Value
Db :
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
4.747
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
0.04264
DLab :
0.08873
Decision
1.404
Reject Null
-1.821
P Value
2.101
0.0003707
2.101
32.87
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
------------------------------------------------------------------
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Minimum
6.028
-5.592
Maximum
2.315
Std Dev
1.777
Mean
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
2.497
-5.990
-9.139
Maximum
2.443
7.954
3.745
Std Dev
-0.5252
3.461
2.497
Mean
DE 94:
-1.626
0.3479
DL :
0.2667
0.4037
0.0000
Da :
10.24
-5.588
Db :
3.229
5.948
-8.568
4.781
2.286
-5.517
DE :
1.728
4.817
0.9842
2.485
8.324
9.882
2.145
2.485
3.136
-0.5412
3.438
4.756
DL :
0.6995
-0.7987
DE :
Da :
DL :
2.101
-0.9168
0.1857
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
Db :
Fail to Reject
Decision
Decision
0.1776
0.3704
0.03333
P Value
P Value
-0.9492
0.3359
-1.952
Test Statistic
Test Statistic
2.101
2.101
2.101
Critical Value
Critical Value
DL :
Da :
9.717
16.13
0.009413
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Db :
Minimum
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
Maximum
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Std Dev
DLab :
0.1840
Decision
0.1934
Reject Null
0.8868
P Value
-0.9234
0.01412
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
14.46
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
0.5751
1.214
5.999
9.506
-5.988
1.696
2.980
5.657
2.362
4.603
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
6.971
DE 94:
2.458
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
-7.920
-0.5716
3.204
-5.575
DL :
-0.1605
-0.03855
Decision
2.225
Da :
P Value
2.458
Db :
Test Statistic
-1.014
Critical Value
2.101
0.4827
0.1621
DL :
0.4148
Decision
-0.2183
Fail to Reject
-0.04404
0.2364
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
4.699
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
------------------------------------------------------------------
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Green Print Selection --
------------------------------------------------------------------
8.628
-5.912
Minimum
6.392
Maximum
2.156
Std Dev
2.804
-13.40
-2.586
Mean
2.573
6.250
6.703
Minimum
DE :
0.03633
4.070
2.804
Maximum
DE 94:
0.4723
Std Dev
DL :
-0.3879
Mean
0.6305
Da :
Fail to Reject
DL :
2.101
0.05647
0.3414
0.2247
0.4778
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.5544
-5.883
Db :
1.366
8.406
-2.888
14.86
6.363
-12.51
3.437
2.112
6.449
4.364
2.796
6.873
1.378
2.606
2.796
14.10
0.02824
4.035
3.265
0.1907
4.431
DL :
0.2885
DE :
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
Decision
0.4827
0.7733
P Value
P Value
0.04404
-0.4153
Test Statistic
Test Statistic
2.101
2.101
Critical Value
Critical Value
2.101
DL :
Da :
Decision
Db :
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
0.6087
P Value
Fail to Reject
Test Statistic
0.3798
1.877
0.3795
9.717
Critical Value
0.3108
DLab :
0.3116
Decision
2.101
Fail to Reject
2.101
0.9553
P Value
Da :
Test Statistic
Db :
0.3186
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
9.717
Critical Value
------------------------------------------------------------------
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Minimum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum
-5.871
Std Dev
8.622
Mean
6.374
Minimum
2.148
Maximum
2.796
-13.41
-2.542
Std Dev
2.561
5.874
6.754
Mean
DE :
0.03898
4.010
2.796
0.5772
DE 94:
0.5229
1.280
DL :
-0.6489
14.83
-5.977
0.5314
Da :
3.440
6.357
8.456
Db :
4.340
2.808
2.127
-13.07
-2.732
1.352
2.571
6.662
6.404
14.51
-0.008023
4.088
2.808
3.355
0.3002
4.386
DL :
-0.01748
DE :
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
0.4761
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.06078
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
DL :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.4951
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
P Value
-0.01245
0.2448
0.2014
Test Statistic
2.101
0.8568
Critical Value
-0.7053
DL :
2.101
Decision
2.101
Fail to Reject
Da :
0.3591
P Value
Db :
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
3.451
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
0.4927
DLab :
0.3118
Decision
0.4994
Fail to Reject
-0.01864
0.9516
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
0.3369
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
------------------------------------------------------------------
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
------------------------------------------------------------------
8.664
-5.934
Minimum
6.395
Maximum
2.162
Std Dev
2.808
Mean
2.563
Minimum
DE :
0.03094
Maximum
DE 94:
-13.87
-2.178
Std Dev
DL :
5.749
6.986
Mean
0.5543
4.062
2.808
0.5140
-5.912
0.8431
0.9606
8.626
-0.8684
15.19
6.392
Da :
3.547
2.156
Db :
4.379
2.804
-13.39
-2.586
1.366
2.573
6.249
6.703
14.85
0.03632
4.069
2.804
3.436
0.4724
4.364
DL :
-0.3875
DE :
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
0.4811
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.04803
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
DL :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.4778
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
P Value
0.05646
0.1819
0.08928
Test Statistic
2.101
1.400
Critical Value
-0.9318
DL :
2.101
Decision
2.101
Fail to Reject
Da :
0.1104
P Value
Db :
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
7.066
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
0.3415
DLab :
0.2247
Decision
0.7734
Fail to Reject
-0.4151
0.6090
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
1.876
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
-5.871
Maximum
8.623
Std Dev
6.374
Mean
2.148
0.5760
2.796
-13.42
-2.534
1.272
2.561
5.866
6.761
14.83
0.03868
4.010
2.796
3.441
0.5307
4.340
DL :
-0.6561
DE :
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.4763
P Value
0.06031
Test Statistic
2.101
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
DL :
0.2424
0.1980
Decision
0.8696
Fail to Reject
-0.7132
0.3495
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
3.532
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Green Transparency Selection --
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
-4.978
-8.834
0.6970
1.088
4.467
13.64
14.12
7.660
3.401
3.773
4.197
3.133
4.595
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
DE :
1.585
2.739
DE 94:
DL :
1.384
-0.8495
0.5690
0.8182
Da :
13.47
13.86
Db :
3.392
3.796
-4.757
3.054
4.425
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
-6.495
DE 94:
4.685
13.58
7.495
4.197
4.185
-8.933
1.460
2.729
13.41
DL :
1.199
-0.6158
4.185
Da :
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
-6.403
Db :
0.05852
Decision
1.646
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
DL :
0.07341
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
0.02041
Decision
0.07284
2.203
-1.516
P Value
1.521
2.101
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
5.179
Test Statistic
0.2018
P Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
0.1428
DLab :
0.03573
Decision
1.915
Fail to Reject
-1.100
0.2610
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
4.401
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Da :
DL :
0.5757
-0.4890
1.462
2.706
4.185
6.814
4.831
13.48
13.81
-8.802
Db :
3.416
3.875
-6.131
3.002
4.199
-4.633
-8.931
0.5148
0.5178
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
DE :
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
DE 94:
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
0.0000
1.820
13.65
-6.055
13.78
14.74
3.759
3.438
3.715
4.205
8.083
3.166
5.134
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
4.205
DE 94:
1.632
2.753
13.41
DL :
1.776
-1.942
4.185
Da :
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
-7.053
Db :
0.07260
Decision
1.523
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
DL :
0.1966
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
0.1830
Decision
0.05398
0.9275
-0.8746
P Value
1.692
2.101
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
2.382
Test Statistic
0.5150
P Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
9.717
Critical Value
Reject Null
DLab :
0.001650
Decision
0.005763
Reject Null
2.812
P Value
-3.385
0.02207
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
12.70
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
1.635
2.730
4.203
4.203
7.408
4.269
13.65
-5.356
-8.796
0.0000
1.129
DL :
1.156
-1.211
13.74
14.34
Da :
3.456
3.803
Db :
3.098
4.616
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
DE :
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
DE 94:
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
0.6973
1.090
-4.978
13.64
14.12
-6.400
3.401
3.773
4.466
3.133
4.595
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
7.661
DE 94:
4.197
-8.834
1.585
2.738
13.58
DL :
1.385
-0.8501
4.197
Da :
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
-6.608
Db :
0.05360
Decision
1.696
P Value
2.101
0.02289
Test Statistic
DL :
0.04069
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
1.846
-2.146
Decision
0.05852
2.101
2.101
P Value
1.646
Da :
Test Statistic
2.101
Db :
Critical Value
DL :
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
Decision
9.717
4.921
Test Statistic
0.2197
P Value
Fail to Reject
Decision
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
0.5148
P Value
Critical Value
0.07328
Maximum
0.07270
Test Statistic
DLab :
0.02034
Decision
2.205
Fail to Reject
-1.517
0.2014
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
5.186
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Std Dev
0.5142
0.5178
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
13.48
13.81
-7.059
3.416
3.876
4.840
3.001
4.196
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
6.807
DE 94:
4.184
0.2004
-4.625
1.461
2.705
Decision
-8.932
DL :
0.5697
-0.4812
P Value
1.522
0.1854
13.41
Da :
Test Statistic
2.101
0.9179
-0.8607
4.184
Db :
Critical Value
DL :
2.101
2.101
2.383
Fail to Reject
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Blue Print Selection --
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
6.027
-5.484
-13.16
0.4474
1.214
7.610
13.28
14.04
3.418
2.982
3.576
-1.249
3.456
2.592
4.627
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
DE :
DL :
0.7894
0.04093
DE 94:
Da :
0.0000
0.7105
-13.10
Db :
13.16
13.58
-6.488
2.993
3.693
-3.820
2.553
4.919
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
5.195
DE 94:
8.662
1.273
3.408
3.418
-1.210
3.465
1.294
DL :
1.851
-0.8422
3.408
Da :
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
-4.872
Db :
0.06434
Decision
-1.593
P Value
2.101
0.4772
Test Statistic
DL :
0.1663
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
0.9956
0.05803
Decision
0.06960
2.101
P Value
-1.547
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
10.46
Test Statistic
0.04052
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
9.717
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
DLab :
0.1263
Decision
0.01588
Reject Null
2.328
P Value
-1.182
0.01272
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
14.88
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
DL :
0.5820
0.2731
-1.143
3.485
3.409
3.409
7.501
6.362
1.358
-5.373
-13.04
0.0000
1.224
Da :
13.17
14.02
-13.28
Db :
2.974
3.551
-4.907
2.543
4.648
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
DE :
1.169
-4.331
DE 94:
6.198
0.5227
0.9317
3.422
8.032
13.44
14.22
3.422
3.003
3.550
-1.371
3.434
2.709
4.755
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
1.285
0.4262
DE 94:
Da :
0.08057
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
-5.132
Db :
0.3544
Decision
-1.461
0.2380
P Value
2.101
0.3795
Test Statistic
DL :
0.7281
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
2.101
Decision
0.04887
2.101
P Value
-1.747
Da :
Test Statistic
2.101
Db :
Critical Value
DL :
Fail to Reject
10.95
Test Statistic
0.03539
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
0.2723
DLab :
0.06009
Decision
1.631
Reject Null
0.6175
P Value
2.101
0.0001816
2.101
37.56
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
3.500
Std Dev
14.66
Maximum
1.069
Minimum
3.422
7.012
7.557
1.279
-5.540
-3.800
-13.17
0.5311
4.893
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
1.211
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
14.04
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
3.576
-1.251
3.460
3.422
DE :
4.627
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
1.610
13.40
DL :
0.1490
2.957
Da :
2.798
Db :
DE 94:
-5.486
0.4486
-4.869
-1.594
0.06416
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
-13.16
6.025
13.28
7.613
2.101
1.273
3.418
2.982
-1.249
3.456
DL :
0.4266
0.01732
3.418
DL :
0.7919
0.03849
2.592
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
Fail to Reject
2.285
Decision
Decision
0.06435
0.1877
P Value
P Value
-1.592
2.101
Test Statistic
Test Statistic
2.101
2.101
Critical Value
Critical Value
DL :
Da :
Reject Null
Decision
9.717
48.10
4.441e-005
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Fail to Reject
Db :
Minimum
P Value
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
Maximum
0.03506
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Std Dev
-5.362
-13.04
Test Statistic
DLab :
0.4785
Decision
0.1656
Reject Null
0.9986
P Value
0.05456
0.04056
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
10.45
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
1.359
-5.143
0.0000
1.226
6.373
13.17
14.03
3.409
7.491
2.974
3.550
3.409
2.543
4.648
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
-1.142
3.485
DE 94:
DL :
0.2844
Fail to Reject
Fail to Reject
0.5716
0.08067
Da :
0.3487
Db :
-1.461
0.2419
Decision
0.3951
P Value
2.101
0.7150
Test Statistic
2.101
Critical Value
DL :
2.101
10.98
Fail to Reject
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
-- Segmented Alfvin Dataset : Blue Transparency Selection --
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
4.969
Std Dev
21.43
Maximum
1.396
Minimum
1.661
4.745
2.604
2.604
3.623
14.45
11.77
-15.59
-4.336
-0.6176
0.9194
6.089
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
1.007
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
22.30
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
5.353
1.198
DE :
6.139
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
-2.754
12.30
Da :
2.951
-0.8454
Db :
2.924
11.52
-15.91
-3.443
DE 94:
2.596
3.407
15.44
0.4541
1.435
4.759
2.596
12.04
2.093
3.027
DL :
-3.039
2.838
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
0.006173
Reject Null
Decision
2.780
P Value
2.101
Test Statistic
DL :
Critical Value
Reject Null
Decision
0.01345
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
P Value
2.409
0.1408
Test Statistic
2.101
0.01047
Critical Value
1.110
DL :
-2.530
Decision
2.101
Reject Null
2.101
P Value
Da :
0.002816
Db :
21.62
Test Statistic
Reject Null
9.717
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
DLab :
0.03522
Decision
0.006134
Reject Null
1.923
P Value
-2.783
0.03868
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
10.62
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Minimum
6.373
Mean
5.629
Std Dev
23.06
Maximum
1.471
4.800
2.596
2.596
2.941
15.93
11.56
-16.49
-3.127
-0.8103
0.4120
0.6129
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
1.326
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
19.41
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
4.366
2.457
DE :
6.083
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
-3.537
12.12
Da :
3.081
-0.4300
Db :
2.903
-6.012
DE 94:
-14.76
0.6045
12.27
12.56
4.302
11.97
2.610
2.813
1.842
4.706
2.610
DL :
-2.022
-0.6373
3.096
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
Reject Null
Decision
0.01186
P Value
2.470
Test Statistic
2.101
Critical Value
DL :
Decision
Reject Null
Reject Null
Reject Null
P Value
0.01905
0.003245
3.078
0.002413
Test Statistic
2.101
2.238
Critical Value
-3.213
DL :
2.101
Decision
2.101
Reject Null
Da :
P Value
Db :
0.009283
Fail to Reject
16.19
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
9.717
Critical Value
0.2752
DLab :
0.03874
Decision
-1.872
Reject Null
-0.6085
P Value
2.101
1.609e-006
2.101
81.49
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Segmented Results – Alfvin’s Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
DL :
-2.669
0.3723
1.808
4.755
2.608
2.608
3.708
13.60
11.93
-5.161
-0.4687
0.7689
1.931
Da :
12.50
20.83
-0.6176
Db :
2.894
4.718
11.77
-15.59
-4.337
3.039
6.170
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
DE :
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
DE 94:
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
0.9195
1.396
2.604
3.623
14.45
12.30
21.43
1.661
4.745
2.604
2.951
4.969
1.197
2.924
6.089
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
-2.754
DE 94:
Da :
Reject Null
-15.51
Db :
0.003664
Decision
3.022
Fail to Reject
P Value
2.101
0.3664
Test Statistic
DL :
0.01247
Critical Value
Reject Null
0.3467
Decision
0.006174
-2.446
P Value
2.780
2.101
Test Statistic
2.101
2.101
Critical Value
Da :
DL :
Db :
60.94
1.055e-005
P Value
Reject Null
Decision
Reject Null
Reject Null
9.717
Test Statistic
Fail to Reject
Maximum
-0.8108
0.4095
0.6019
11.56
-16.50
-3.115
Critical Value
0.1409
Std Dev
23.07
2.596
2.931
15.94
DLab :
0.01048
Decision
1.110
Reject Null
-2.530
P Value
2.101
0.002817
2.101
21.62
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Mean
5.636
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
6.377
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
1.471
4.800
2.596
12.12
2.469
3.082
DL :
-3.547
2.904
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
Reject Null
Decision
0.01188
P Value
2.470
Test Statistic
2.101
Reject Null
Reject Null
Critical Value
0.01864
DL :
0.002369
Decision
2.249
Reject Null
-3.221
P Value
2.101
0.009238
2.101
16.21
Test Statistic
Da :
9.717
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
APPENDIX 3
COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS DATA SHEETS
LAB ‘98 DATA SET
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 98 Data Set
------------------------------------------------------------------
IDL> main_Lab_98_eval
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Minimum
5.249
-5.182
Maximum
3.326
Std Dev
1.072
Mean
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
1.639
-2.796
-5.167
Maximum
2.570
3.362
1.969
Std Dev
-0.4350
1.319
1.639
Mean
DE 94:
-1.430
0.0000
DL :
0.2846
0.2426
0.3566
Da :
5.819
-5.144
Db :
1.190
7.376
-6.466
2.895
3.336
-2.353
DE :
1.823
1.505
0.4090
1.670
5.124
7.779
3.494
1.670
1.999
-0.2668
1.782
3.797
DL :
1.435
-2.262
DE :
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
0.002175
Reject Null
Decision
-2.907
P Value
1.980
Test Statistic
DL :
Critical Value
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
Decision
0.04132
0.0000
P Value
-1.750
0.009856
Test Statistic
1.980
2.364
-8.889
Critical Value
1.980
DL :
1.980
Reject Null
Decision
Reject Null
Da :
0.0000
P Value
Db :
Test Statistic
Reject Null
126.4
Reject Null
8.046
Critical Value
0.0000
DLab :
0.0000
Reject Null
Decision
8.819
P Value
-10.80
0.0000
1.980
Test Statistic
1.980
154.8
Da :
8.046
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
-5.137
Maximum
6.495
Std Dev
3.342
Mean
1.385
0.2956
1.672
-3.069
-5.823
0.2959
3.107
4.205
1.954
6.737
-0.2510
1.691
1.672
1.498
-1.721
3.385
DL :
0.6254
DE :
Da :
0.3632
-5.185
Db :
5.341
-2.143
1.008
3.342
-2.504
2.034
2.429
DE :
1.624
3.356
Fail to Reject
DE 94:
1.624
0.05135
0.2901
-0.5425
1.246
-1.645
5.295
0.2841
1.980
0.9857
DL :
0.4165
DL :
1.846
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
Reject Null
Reject Null
Decision
Decision
0.0001893
0.0000
P Value
P Value
-3.659
4.542e-005
Test Statistic
Test Statistic
1.980
4.052
-8.699
Critical Value
Critical Value
1.980
DL :
1.980
Reject Null
Decision
Reject Null
Da :
0.0000
P Value
Db :
Test Statistic
Reject Null
121.6
Reject Null
8.046
Critical Value
0.0001868
DLab :
4.053e-006
Decision
4.667
Reject Null
3.663
P Value
1.980
5.960e-008
1.980
42.91
Test Statistic
Da :
8.046
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 98 Data Set
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Minimum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum
-5.187
Std Dev
3.334
Mean
1.629
0.1586
-0.5036
0.1762
DE 94:
-3.210
-2.779
5.315
DL :
2.601
2.804
1.008
0.0000
1.227
1.629
2.075
-5.182
0.1441
DE :
5.250
-0.3038
0.2436
3.326
Da :
5.819
1.072
Db :
1.190
1.639
-2.796
-5.167
2.895
2.570
3.365
1.969
DE :
-0.4349
1.320
1.639
5.261
-1.429
0.9770
DL :
0.2861
1.864
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
0.0004802
Reject Null
Decision
-3.386
P Value
1.980
Test Statistic
DL :
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
Critical Value
Reject Null
0.04275
Decision
0.002180
0.003845
P Value
-2.906
1.734
Test Statistic
1.980
-2.712
Critical Value
1.980
DL :
1.980
Decision
Da :
Reject Null
Db :
Reject Null
P Value
Reject Null
0.001150
0.0000
17.04
Test Statistic
0.009595
8.046
Critical Value
2.374
Decision
Reject Null
DLab :
-8.883
0.0000
P Value
1.980
Test Statistic
1.980
126.2
Da :
8.046
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
-5.137
Maximum
6.492
Std Dev
3.342
Mean
1.383
0.2957
1.672
-3.072
-5.819
0.2960
3.106
4.201
1.957
6.733
-0.2507
1.691
1.672
1.495
-1.718
3.384
DL :
0.6222
DE :
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
Fail to Reject
Decision
0.05156
P Value
-1.643
Test Statistic
1.980
Reject Null
Critical Value
0.0000
DL :
4.917e-005
Reject Null
Decision
Reject Null
4.031
-8.682
0.0000
P Value
1.980
Test Statistic
1.980
121.3
Da :
8.046
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 98 Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 98 Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 98 Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 98 Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 98 Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 98 Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 98 Data Set
23 April, 1999
APPENDIX 4
COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS DATA SHEETS
LAB ‘99 DATA SET
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 99 Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
IDL> main_Lab_99_eval
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
1.832
1.280
1.782
1.782
1.381
2.694
6.809
-5.930
-3.300
0.6862
0.7190
-1.260
7.358
7.739
DL :
-1.495
1.498
1.546
Da :
3.501
3.863
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
DE :
-3.313
Db :
DE 94:
7.039
-5.260
-7.160
0.6375
0.7243
1.891
3.164
2.990
8.192
8.542
1.908
1.953
1.891
1.763
1.791
-1.719
4.155
4.533
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
-0.7549
DE 94:
Da :
-4.981
Db :
Reject Null
Decision
Reject Null
Reject Null
Reject Null
Decision
0.0000
P Value
9.195
0.0000
3.159e-006
Test Statistic
-4.842
Critical Value
1.990
-10.44
Decision
DL :
1.990
P Value
0.0000
1.990
Test Statistic
9.029
Da :
Critical Value
1.990
Db :
Reject Null
DL :
Reject Null
0.0000
P Value
Reject Null
Test Statistic
0.0004401
338.7
1.550e-006
8.170
Critical Value
-5.023
DLab :
-3.458
Decision
1.990
0.0000
P Value
1.990
Test Statistic
Reject Null
245.1
Da :
8.170
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
1.901
1.901
2.092
3.202
7.065
-6.389
-3.304
0.7800
0.8925
1.920
1.652
7.781
8.109
-1.217
1.488
1.507
DL :
-1.434
4.005
4.364
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Mean
DE :
Da :
DE 94:
Db :
0.5688
0.7105
-3.161
6.944
6.985
-4.734
1.183
1.189
2.188
2.788
3.066
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
1.475
DE 94:
1.699
-3.280
1.791
1.244
6.871
DL :
-1.302
-0.1627
1.699
Da :
Reject Null
Decision
Reject Null
Reject Null
Reject Null
-5.489
Db :
0.0000
Decision
9.034
P Value
1.990
0.0000
0.0001104
Test Statistic
DL :
-3.873
Critical Value
Reject Null
-7.765
Decision
0.0000
1.990
P Value
9.429
1.990
Test Statistic
1.990
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
0.0000
P Value
Fail to Reject
Test Statistic
Reject Null
349.5
0.1196
8.170
Critical Value
0.0000
DLab :
-1.186
Reject Null
Decision
-9.360
0.0000
P Value
1.990
Test Statistic
1.990
319.5
Da :
8.170
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 99 Data Set
Minimum
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
Da :
DL :
-1.937
-0.08956
1.807
1.734
1.734
1.160
6.819
2.625
0.5677
P Value
9.322
0.2801
Test Statistic
1.990
0.0000
0.0000
DL :
-14.93
-0.5849
0.0000
P Value
1.990
Test Statistic
1.990
494.2
Db :
8.170
Critical Value
Da :
DLab :
Reject Null
Decision
Reject Null
Fail to Reject
Reject Null
Decision
-5.035
-3.512
-3.282
0.7054
0.7172
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Maximum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Std Dev
-3.300
Db :
-6.384
-3.304
7.033
7.143
-5.930
7.066
1.200
1.230
6.809
-4.981
3.124
3.417
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
DE :
2.695
DE 94:
1.782
1.385
0.6861
0.7190
1.782
7.358
7.739
1.832
1.281
1.498
1.545
-1.260
3.501
3.863
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
-1.493
DE 94:
Da :
Maximum
3.204
Critical Value
Db :
Reject Null
Decision
Reject Null
Reject Null
Reject Null
Decision
0.0000
P Value
9.196
0.0000
3.159e-006
Test Statistic
1.990
-4.842
Critical Value
DL :
-10.42
0.0000
P Value
1.990
Test Statistic
1.990
338.4
Da :
8.170
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Std Dev
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
1.901
2.086
0.7814
0.8943
1.901
7.780
8.107
1.920
1.651
1.487
1.506
-1.213
4.005
4.363
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
-1.437
DE 94:
Da :
-5.490
Db :
Reject Null
Decision
Reject Null
Reject Null
Reject Null
Decision
0.0000
P Value
9.033
0.0000
0.0001139
Test Statistic
1.990
-3.863
Critical Value
DL :
-7.788
0.0000
P Value
1.990
Test Statistic
1.990
350.1
Da :
8.170
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 99 Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 99 Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 99 Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 99 Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 99 Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 99 Data Set
23 April, 1999
Prediction of Metamer Pair – Lab 4 99 Data Set
23 April, 1999
APPENDIX 5
COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS DATA SHEETS
Thornton Data Set
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Stiles Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
1.610
16.54
0.0000
3.220
0.0000
-21.09
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.610
17.28
27.00
8.272
8.641
13.50
4.320
6.750
IDL> main_thornton_eval
DE 94:
DE :
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1931 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum
0.8051
0.0000
DL :
4.136
-5.273
21.39
Da :
Maximum
0.0000
Db :
10.69
13.99
-17.21
0.0000
Std Dev
2.150
5.346
6.996
0.0000
Mean
1.075
DE :
3.498
1.075
DE 94:
-4.302
Accept Null
Accept Null
0.5375
0.1955
DL :
0.1955
Da :
1.000
0.1955
Decision
3.182
1.000
-1.000
P Value
3.182
2.384
Test Statistic
0.8527
P Value
Accept Null
Decision
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
1.060
9.899
0.0000
2.120
0.0000
-16.49
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.060
12.11
19.35
4.950
6.057
9.673
3.029
4.837
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DE 94:
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Demarco Color Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
1941.
Critical Value
Test Statistic
DL :
3.182
Decision
Critical Value
0.0000
Da :
12.52
Decision
Db :
6.258
P Value
Accept Null
Accept Null
3.129
0.1955
0.1955
Db :
1.000
Accept Null
Test Statistic
-1.000
Critical Value
3.182
3.182
0.9661
P Value
Accept Null
Da :
DL :
Test Statistic
Accept Null
0.6515
0.1955
1.000
1941.
Critical Value
0.0000
DLab :
3.182
Db :
DLab :
38.99
Maximum
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on CIE 1964 Color Matching Function prediction of metamer pair
19.50
Std Dev
------------------------------------------------------------------
9.748
0.5301
Mean
DL :
2.475
-4.121
DE :
Da :
0.0000
Db :
24.90
-33.45
0.0000
12.45
4.345
6.225
0.0000
DE 94:
2.172
Accept Null
Accept Null
2.172
0.1955
1.086
0.1955
-8.363
1.000
0.1955
DL :
3.182
1.000
-1.000
Da :
3.182
Decision
DL :
3.182
P Value
0.0000
Da :
1941.
Critical Value
-2.893
Test Statistic
0.0000
P Value
Accept Null
Decision
Test Statistic
19.56
Decision
Db :
Decision
Critical Value
9.781
P Value
Accept Null
Accept Null
4.890
0.1955
0.1955
Db :
1.000
Accept Null
Test Statistic
-1.000
Critical Value
3.182
3.182
0.9784
P Value
Accept Null
Da :
DL :
Test Statistic
Accept Null
0.4624
0.1955
1.000
1941.
Critical Value
DLab :
3.182
Db :
DLab :
Mean
Std Dev
Maximum
0.0000
0.0000
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Shaw and Fairchild Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Minimum
------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum
CIE LAB statistics based on Stockman Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Std Dev
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mean
19.77
31.86
-27.19
0.0000
9.885
3.860
15.93
1.930
16.15
0.0000
4.943
1.930
7.964
DE 94:
0.9650
8.075
DE :
0.0000
DL :
4.037
-6.796
0.0000
Da :
17.26
0.0000
Db :
26.96
-21.08
8.628
3.220
0.0000
13.48
1.610
16.51
0.0000
4.314
1.610
6.741
0.8049
8.254
DE :
DL :
4.127
-5.269
DE 94:
Da :
Accept Null
Accept Null
0.0000
Db :
0.1955
Decision
1.000
P Value
3.182
0.1955
Test Statistic
DL :
0.1955
Critical Value
Accept Null
1.000
-1.000
Decision
0.1955
3.182
P Value
1.000
3.182
Test Statistic
3.182
Da :
Critical Value
DL :
Db :
1941.
5.347
Test Statistic
0.7147
P Value
Accept Null
Decision
Accept Null
Accept Null
Decision
Critical Value
Accept Null
Maximum
-16.47
0.0000
Accept Null
DLab :
0.1955
Decision
0.1955
Accept Null
1.000
P Value
-1.000
0.9245
3.182
Test Statistic
3.182
1.259
Da :
1941.
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
Std Dev
Minimum
CIE LAB statistics based on Vos Cone Fundamentals prediction of metamer pair
Mean
2.114
0.0000
0.0000
1.057
9.879
0.0000
12.10
19.32
1.057
6.048
9.661
0.5284
4.940
3.024
4.830
------------------------------------------------------------------
DE :
DL :
2.470
-4.117
DE 94:
Da :
Accept Null
Accept Null
0.0000
Db :
0.1955
Decision
0.1955
P Value
1.000
0.1955
Test Statistic
3.182
1.000
-1.000
Critical Value
DL :
3.182
0.0000
P Value
Accept Null
3.182
-0.2271
Test Statistic
Da :
1941.
Critical Value
Db :
DLab :
APPENDIX 6
IDL CODE
COMPUTER SIMULATION
!" #$ %# &# 99
99 99 99
*
+ $' 8,8 ; +* ': *+
+* ': $'$
+* ': $'$$'
'* '
99
99 99 99
*
%516170! 8
8 +* !012340
'$ ( ) *+* ,$*
$* '$-. $'$, ) /
* ( D8
$*$* '$M$
$'$<$
) ) (
$*$* '$ **$ $'$+**$ ) ) (
%A &( *+*
C3>70"D1#0 !" #$* : $'$ %#$ &#$
*
' <$
=K1"L =K1"L J 9 J B'
B' *BJJ:+B
E+B
;>;F5# "BF !" #$* G
*
;8H 6 ; 6 H #+8 G
+;A G
;
G
;
G
$**
;2
G
$ ;2
G
$+ ;(A G
;2
G
+
;2
G
+
;2
G
+**$ ;2
I
:$:
:$
:
$ A
$
((
* *
8C** ; #
6+ 2" A B* *
+*?@
+*?@
'+ +*+*
6+ =>:6 -2-!#
+$*
99
99 99 99
*
+ $' 8+**$8 ; *
+* ': *
8<$8
; +* ': ;
*+
+* ': $'$
+* ': $'$$'
+$*'* '
; *
+* ': $ *
; +* ': +* : '$H 6 ; J :*
+* ': $'$
+* :+**$ *'
?(/@ ? :+@ * +,$*+)))))) ++ G
#+ !*+ C'*B #+ > +B +B
'*B :+?N@ ++))
:*
:+?(;A(@
'*B
?(;A(@
3H :* 60 88 B* *
:*88
:*+, B:+BJF5F #+ #+ > H 8N:8 $
; * 9 #+ !*+ >
+ :+
$+ :$+?:$**N@:$+?:$**N@
8+8 ; *
8<$8
+ $' 8+**$8
+* ': $'$
+* ': $'$$'
'* '
!
*
%516170! 8+$*8 +:+BJ8F>F#$:8
' + $ +* !012340
$'$
+ ; *
8+
8; *
+* ':'$
*
$'$
+* ': $'$
*
?(/@ ? @ * +,$*+)))))) ++ G
#+ !+*+ C'*B #+ > +B +B
**AN)J( $+ ++))O
**AN)J( :+ ++))
* *
?(/@ ? @ * +,$*+)))))) ++ G
#+ !+*+ C'*B #+ > +B +B
**AN)J( $+ ++))O
:* < H 6 ; 6 H #+ B* *
$+ :$+?:$**N@:$+?:$**N@
+ ; :$**
; :$**
; :$**
; :$**
;
*+
8$**
8; *
+* ':'$
:* < 88 B* *
:*8H 6 ; 6 H #+8
+* : '$:*
+* ': $'$
+* :+**$ *'
*
*
;
*
*
*
+* : '$H 6 ; J :*
+* ': $'$
+* :+**$ *'
?(/@ ? @ * +,$*+)))))) ++ G
#+ !+*+ C'*B #+ > +B +B
**AN)J( :+?N@ ++))
**AN)J( $+ ++))O
* :*O
:+ *?(;A(@
3H :* 60 88 B* *
:*88
:*+, B:+BJF5F #+ #+ > H 8N:8 $
; * 9 #+ !+*+ >
*
*
;
+* ': $'$
*
* ( D8
*
:+ A
:+
:*
H 6 ; 6 H #+
99 ! B + + ?(/@ ?@ * +,$*+)))))) ++ 8C'*B *8 8!+*+ H+8
+* !012340
:+
+$ ?8!*+8 8!+*+8@ * +$' '$ G
8#+ >8 $'$8+
8 $* ) A A) )
:$ +$ ?8>A)8 8>))8 818 8H$+*8 @ +$* * +$' '$ G
8!*+ 3$**8 $'$8$**
8 $* ) P A) (
:+**$ $* '$ **$ $'$+**$ ) A) (
:
'$H 6 ; 6 H #+ ) ( A) $*$* '$2 #+ > $'$+ ) A) )
$*$* '$M$
$'$<$
) A) /
%A &( *+*
C3>70"D1#0 !" #$* : $'$ %#$ &#$
*
:$:
:$
:
$ O
$
(
:
:
* *
* 8C** ; #
6+ 2" A B* *
6+ =>:6 -2-!#
9 *
*+
9
:+
9 #+ !*+
+* :$ *'
*
; *
:+
9 #+ !+*+
+* :$ *'
+* *'* E3>;:+
"-K;': L16>20!;':B*I *+
*
;
*+
8F>F>A):8
8F>F>)):8
8F>F1:8
8F>FH$+*:8
;
;
*
+* ': *
*
+* ': *
6+ 2" A B* *
6+ =>:6 -2-!#
$ 9 *
*+
8$*8
+ $' 8<$8
;
+* ': $'$
+* ': $'$$'
$'* '
*
%516170! 88 +* $'$
+* :+**$ *'
+* :$ *'
*
$**
O) :+B J :$+?N@ $**?;O@
+ ; ; ; ; ;
*+
* 8C** ; #
* ( D8
%516170! 8$8 *
+<$ 99 B *'$ B+ *
+* '$
:53>?@ +* '$
:53>?@ +* '$
:53>?@ +* ( '$
:53>?@ +* ) '$
:53>?(@ +* A '$
:53>?)@ +* / '$
:53>?A@ 9 +* +,$* '$
9 :D+,$* +* !012340
99 0+ B 7B+ * 3>
&)
&)
&)
&)
&)
&)
&)
O/
(
A/
O/
(
A/
(
O
O
O
O)
O)
O)
(P
'$ 30 P 5H $'$ ) O/ ) *
'$ 30 PA( 5H $'$ ) ( ) *
'$# 5H $'$ ) A/ ) *
'$>+ 5H $'$ ) O/ )) *
'$#+,* 5H $'$ ) ( )) *
'$Q 5H $'$ ) A/ )) *
'$#B 5H $'$ ) ( (A *
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
$*
$*
$*
$*
$*
$*
$*
(
)
A
/
$*
$*(
$*)
$*/
$*O
$*P
$*
99 D$ B '$ +** B #$*
$*$* '$M$ $'$<$
) /
$*$* '$!$* $'$$* ) $() /
9 +,$* %$ &$
C3>70"D1#0 !" #$* : $'$ %#$ &#$
) )
E D+,$*;2 53>;/ I
*
:$:
:$
:
$ (
$
/AO
:
:
* *
$* $$
*
32 *
$$
?33@*$
?3@
*
***$
$$
$*+* * *$
99 H$*+* , *$ +$* * * * B 99 3*$ *$
; *$ '$
99
99 -$$ $$
*$
*$
J $* *$
*
*$
?@
N?@
N?@
N?@
$*+* *$
99 H$*+* 1 +, $$ 99 3*$ *$
; * +$* *$ $$ 99
; +$* $$ '$
99
99 -$$ *$
; ""
;
;
;
;
5 B ++
?N/;P@
+A(+
?N/;P@
+
?N/;P@
++
?N/;P@
+,*+
?N/;P@
'+
?N/;P@
B+
?N/;P@
+ :+
; *
+
8!*+8
$**
AJ
*
99 0+ K
+
+A(
+
+,*
'
B
99 +$ Q$ "$$ Q$
++
*
+A(+
*
+
*
++
*
+,*+
*
'+
*
B+
*
A/
?N;)@ ++
?(;AN@
G
?;N@ G
?A;ON@ G
?N@
I
+*:+ AJ "&K08!*+8 ) +*:+ AJ "&K08!*+8 ) +*: AJ "&K08!*+8 ) +*:+ AJ "&K08!*+8 ) +*:+,* AJ "&K08!*+8 ) +*:' AJ "&K08!*+8 ) +*:B AJ "&K08!*+8 ) ?;N@
+ ;
?/;PN@
+
;
?;)N@ '
;
+?;N@
'*B;
*
+ ++* +* *:++*
*
*:*
++* E +
+,*
B
+
A :+BJ8F>F- 5H#:8 P A :+BJ8F>F++*:8 * :+BJ8F>F7-7 CB8
* :+BJ8F>F#+ !" >8
99 K $* -* #+ >
+<$ #
*
:+
:+
:+
:+
:+
:+
:+
99 0+ H H 858 5 B +
++
?N/@ ++
?NO@ ++
?NP@ +*
+A(
+A(+
?N/@ +A(+
?NO@ +A(+
?NP@ +A(*
+
?N/@ +
?NO@ +
?NP@ *
+ ++
?N/@ ++
?NO@ ++
?NP@ +*
+,* +,*+
?N/@ +,*+
?NO@ +,*+
?NP@ +,**
'
'+
?N/@ '+
?NO@ '+
?NP@ '*
B
B+
?N/@ B+
?NO@ B+
?NP@ B*
99 0+ H B >
+*
++
?NA@ ++
?N)@
+A(*
+A(+
?NA@ +A(+
?N)@
* +
?NA@ +
?N)@
+* ++
?NA@ ++
?N)@
+,** +,*+
?NA@ +,*+
?N)@
'*
'+
?NA@ '+
?N)@
B*
B+
?NA@ B+
?N)@
+*:+ $** "&K0+
) +*:+ $** "&K0+
) +*: $** "&K0+
) +*:+ $** "&K0+
) +*:+,* $** "&K0+
) +*:' $** "&K0+
) +*:B $** "&K0+
) ++
N :+
?N@
+A(+
N :+A(
?N@
+
N :
?N@
++
N :+
?N@
+,*+
N :+,*
?N@
'+
N :'
?N@
B+
N :B
?N@
5 B ++
?N/;P@
+A(+
?N/;P@
+
?N/;P@
++
?N/;P@
+,*+
?N/;P@
'+
?N/;P@
B+
?N/;P@
++
?NA@
+A(+
?NA@
+
?NA@
++
?NA@
+,*+
?NA@
'+
?NA@
B+
?NA@
99 0+ K
+
+A(
+
+,*
'
B
*+
8!+*+8
:$+?:$**N@
++
+A(+
+
++
+,*+
'+
B+
; *
+
$**
B?@ B?@ +?N@ ' *B?@ *B?@ +?N@ ' $B?@ $B?@ +?N@ ' +B B 99 +$ 5 K+ %&4 '$ '
+!7D /
+%&4 /
A *
:53>?@
+?@ +?@ +?@ : B* *
K-2&H322 % & -2-! + '+
%&-S"# ) P "B $ B + +)))))) '+
%&-S"# / A 7$ B + +)))))) '+
* +?@ +?@ +?@ : B* *
K-2&H322 % & -2-! + '+
%&-S"# ) P "B $ B + +)))))) '+
%&-S"# / A 7$ B + +)))))) '+
* *
++ $*+N))
K-2&H322 % & -2-! +++?@ ++?@ ++?@ '+
*
*
% ?) ) ) )@
& ?) )@
99 +$ !7D > $*
+ +?N@
+?N@
+?N@
99 +$ B !7D #+ B /
?N@ *'+ RR * ++
?NA@ +* ?N@ *'+A( RR * +A(+
?NA@ +A(* ?N@ *' RR * +
?NA@ * ?N@ *'+ RR * ++
?NA@ +* ?N(@ *'+,* RR * +,*+
?NA@ +,** ?N)@ *'' RR * '+
?NA@ '* ?NA@ *'B RR * B+
?NA@ B* 99 0+ CB K* B B* /
B*?N@ *'+ RR * ++
?N(@ +* B*?N@ *'+A( RR * +A(+
?N(@ +A(* B*?N@ *' RR * +
?N(@ * B*?N@ *'+ RR * ++
?N(@ +* B*?N(@ *'+,* RR * +,*+
?N(@ +,** B*?N)@ *'' RR * '+
?N(@ '* B*?NA@ *'B RR * B+
?N(@ B* +%&4?N@
+%&4?N@
+%&4?N@
+%&4?N@
+%&4?N(@
+%&4?N)@
+%&4?NA@
+%&4?N@
+%&4?N@
+%&4?N@
+%&4?N@
+%&4?N(@
+%&4?N)@
+%&4?NA@
+*
+A(*
*
+*
+,**
'*
B*
*+ RR *+!7D?N@
*+A( RR *+!7D?N@
* RR *+!7D?N@
*+ RR *+!7D?N@
*+,* RR *+!7D?N(@
*' RR *+!7D?N)@
*B RR *+!7D?NA@
**' < B* *
99 1
7-7 *$
?@
'$
32 *
*$
?3@ 0M : B* *
'$?3@:
* *
'$?3@+N*N*$
?3@J:*T
$*+* + * *$
!0Q0!#0'
99 H$*+* 7* - * 7 99 3*$ *$
; *$ 7-7 99
+
; >1 + *** >1 '$ B* * * 99
*
; 7-7 * 99
; 7-7 99
99 -$$ *$
*
99 >
5 K+ %&48
* * 30 P "$$ Q$ ; ++
?NA@
* 30 P K+ %&4 Q ; +%&4?N@
+%&4?N@
+%&4?N@
+%&4?N@
+%&4?N@
+%&4?N(@
+%&4?N)@
+%&4?NA@
+!7D?N@ B?@ B?@ +?N@ +!7D?N@ *B?@ *B?@ +?N@ +!7D?N@ $B?@ $B?@ +?N@ $* *$
*
*$
+$* * $* * $*
$* *$
$*$*
$*+* +$* *
99 H$*+* 2 * 99 3*$ * ; * B*
99
+$* ; *$ +$*
99
; *$ 99
99 -$$ *$
; *
$* '$
32 *
*$
?3@ 0M : B* *
'$?3@:
* *
'$?3@ *$
?3@T: :* *
9 '$?3@ : B* '$?3@:
*
*
*
99 1
' 7-7 *$
?@
'$
*
*
* *
%&4 ** $* *'
*
1#0 -H
82L#8 ; *' *'**$
RR *$
RR **$
8!L#8 ; *' **$
RR *'*$
RR **$
06> 1#0
**
< B* 82L#8
*$
$
$*+* $*' "&K0
99 H$*+* +$ $*'* * * 99 3*$ ; * *'
99
99 -$$ *' ; $ *' $* *
N
N*
N$
*
++$ %&48 !7D8 * '+ '
* $ +$* '$ 5 * 6 + +$* '$ +$* '$ +$* '$ $*+* *
$
99 H$*+* 7* 99 3*$ ; 99
*
; 99
$
; 99
99
; 99
99 -$$ ; !7D 99 > $* $*+*
$* E ++*
*
$* $*
*
; ++*
; * I
G
99 #B * H+B
*:B $*'++*:+ "&K082L#8 RR ++*:B
++*:B ++*:B RR *' *:B 99 Q * C'*
*:' $*'++*:+ "&K082L#8 RR ++*:'
++*:' ++*:' RR *' *:' 99 #+,* 5+2 * UB**
*:+,* $*'++*:+ "&K082L#8 RR ++*:+,*
++*:+,* ++*:+,* RR *' *:+,* 99 >+ #B * K,*
* H$**
*:+ $*'++*:+ "&K082L#8 RR ++*:+
++*:+ ++*:+ RR *' *:+ 99 # * D$+B K >
*: $*'++*:+ "&K082L#8 RR ++*:
++*: ++*: RR *' *: 99 30 PA( '
*:+ $*'++*:+ "&K082L#8 RR ++*:+
++*:+ ++*:+ RR *' *:+ 99 30 P '
*:+ $*'++*:+ "&K082L#8 RR ++*:+
++*:+ ++*:+
99 +$ $$ '$ +B 5H +* $**
* E + ; + ; ; + ; +,* ; ' ; B ; I
++* ++*
$*+* + ++*
99 99 K$
99 "B $*+* , * B + +B* $*+* * ++$ B ;
99
99 Q 2
99
++* ;
+* + *'
? + A @
99 $*+* + ! 7* D$
'$ ! J )A2 N 7* J )A2 N D$
$* '$
*
$* *
8!*+8 ; *
*$
$$
**$
RR +B
,
B* G
, AO: N G
G
, AO: N ,?@ N $$
*
06> 1#0
8!+*+8 ; *
*$
$$
?@
+*+B RR *$**
$$
**$
RR *+
, : *+B?N@ RR $**
,?@ N $$
*
6-" ,
"&K0 B* 8!+*+8
1#0 $*+* *$
+B $** "&K0
> 99 3*$ *$
; * + 99
$** ; $** 99
+B ; + +B* $*+*
99
99 -$$ $$
;
99 H$*+* , *$ * +$* + * ++$ $$ '$
$%
$*
8
$* *
*
'*B *?N@ O
+ *?N@ O
* ?*'*B *+@
$* V$*, $* $*
*
$* V$*,
*B #"!K-#V$*, 8*
+ *B?@ ; *B ; *B *+
* $* *B
*B
V$*,
* $*
$*+* $ #
$
:P(O
:O
:)/AP
:AP
:P)O
:APO
:A)PO
:POA
:)OPAO
(:A(O
(:/(O
):(/
A:((A
A:P(/
/:O)
O:/APO
P:/P)
:OPPA
:O)
:)(
(:/O
A:(O
/:A/)
P:P/
:PP)
:/OO
(:A/P
A:A()
O://
:O)O
:O)P
):(AO
/:O
(:
(:OAP
():)/(
(O:(
):(O
):P
)A:O)P
)P:OA
A:P
AA:A)
AP:))
/:(P)P
/):/P
/P:A
O:)P
O):P(/
OP:((
P:P
PA:((
:
:)O
/:O(
:O
(:(A
O:O
:/
):OA
P:(
:AP/
A:(A
P:POO
(:AO
(/:)
):OA
)(:(O
)/:P/P
A:)A
A):O
AO:)
/:PA
/):O
/O:/AP
O:O
O):(P
OO:/
P:P
P):O
PO:A
:)P
(:(P
/:(
:A)
:AO
A:
O:P
:AA/
(:A
/:
P:)O)
:)
(:)OP
/:O
P:/
(:A/)
(:P(
(A:A
(O:)
):P
):)
)(:(
)A:
)O:/
)P:OA)
A:A
30 ):POA " :
K ; 30 #* 3$** 1 ' + $*
* O * ) * *'
&&$
:
:A
:
A:A)
:
):P
:A
:)
:P
):O)
/:O
P:
:A
:()
(:
:()
:A
):)
O:
(P:))
A:
A(:O
AO:A
/:
/:A
AP:/)
A/:P
/A:/)
O):A
P:O
PO:
PP:)
:)
:
PP:P
:
:/
:(
PO:
PP:(
:/
:/
:/
:)
:
:
(:
:)
:
:))
:
:)
:
PO:A
P/:
P/:()
P/:/
P(:))
P:(
P:P
P(:(
P(:/)
P):
P(:A)
P(:
P:
P:(
P:)
P:
P:A
OO:P
OP:A
P:
P:
P:P
P:P)
P:
O(:O)
/P:/
O:)
O:O
O:O
O(:O
//:)
/:
/(:/)
/P:
O:)
O):
/O:()
/:P
A:)
):O
A(:)
/):P
/:O)
/:O
'&$
:(
:AA(
:P()
:/A)
:A
O:A((/
/:))
O:)
P:P(OO
(:(
((:P/
()://)
(A:AO
(P:A/
):OP
):
(P:P/))
):O
)(:A(O
AO:/)
O:/)(P
O/:(
P:(OA
P:()OP
P:(O
P:)/
OA:AO
P)://A
(:OA)
:PA
/:O
/:(
/:O
A:A
(:OA
):P
):P
:A/
O:O
P:O
P:)(
O:)/O
/:O
A:PA
(:/P
A:P
/:AOP
A:(/
(:()
(:)
(:(A
:
:
PO:A/
PA:(
PA:A
P):/OO
P:AO
OO:AO)A
OP:()P
P:A
OP:OA
OP:)PP
OO:A(OP
O/:APO/
O):(PA
O:OOA
O:(PP
O:APP
O:OA
O:AO
O:/
O:(A
O:(A
O://O
O:O
/O:O(
/(:/
AP:/
/:AA)
/:AP
/:P/P
/(:(P
A/:P/A)
A:A(
A):/((O
AP:OO)A
/:(OA
/):O/
AP:PO
A:)P/
)):)(
(A:(O
)A:AO
AA:O)(
A):P(
A:OO
A:O((
A(:(
A:O//P
)P:()P
)):/)(
):P)P
)(:APPO
)/:((A
)O:O/A)
A:)
30 ):POA " :
K ; 30 #* 3$** >A) ' + $*
* O * ) * *'
$
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:(P)
A:(AOP
:)A(
(:(P
A:/O
A:O(
(:///(
(:)()
(O:PO(
)(:A)
)P:/(O
(:/()
O:)
/(:OO
/P:()
O:P/O
OA:(
OO:P/(
P:/OO
P:/A))
P:O
P:P)
P:AA
OP:A/
O/:AP
O):A
O:))(
O:)
/O:P/
//:
/A:P/(
/O:O
O:(AA
P:)/PP
O:PO
P(:))AP
:
(:/()
O:(
/:A(
A:(/
O:)
(:(/)
PO:/(P
P:)(
O):AA
//:)PP(
AP:PP
A:()A(
)):)(/O
(O:POO
(:A)P
/:O/
://
O:PA
):(
:O
P:AP
/:AA
):O
:(AO
:O
:A)P
P:P/P
P:
O:(
/:)AA
A:APP
A:(
):A))
):/
):O
):P(
(:/()
(:O)
(:(AA
(:/()
(:O)
(:)AO
:AOO
:/
()*
+%
$,
:))O)
:)PP)(
:/)/)(
:AAPAP
:(O))A
:A(((
:)O
:)PAPA
:/)/)O
://AO
:P/P
:((A/P)
:(P))/
:A(OO)(
:)APOA
:(PA)O)
:))))
:APOAA
:(/AAA
:A)(
:)PP)P
://())
:)/)
:())APP
:OAP
:(()
:OPAA(P)
:(/(OP
:/((
:AA/((
:(P()
:)OAA)(
:)/OO)
:AAO)(P)
:/)/A
:O(AP)
:PAO/
:PO(O)O
:OA()A
:APPP/(
:/)P/(
:(P
:/
:PP)))A
:OP/)(
:/(PA
:A(/P)(
:)/
:(O(/A
:((O
:AAO(
:PA//))O
:((
:(/A
:/APO/A/
:)(/)
:/
:A()
:O/))
:OPPP
:OPO
:/(PP
:P)/P
:)/)
:)/
:)()P
:)(P)O
:A(((
:)(O
:(A)OP
:(())
:()P(/
:OA)/)
:(/O((
:/OP)
:PA(
:)AOP
:OPO//
:)PAO
:AP)/(
:OP((A
:PP(P(
:(OAA/O
:)AA/
:A)O(P
:/OA(
:OO/P))
:OAOOA
:PAO))
:P(/
:P()OAP
:PA)P/(
:PAO(O/
:P((/()
:P(O/P
:PAOA
:OPAO)P
:O)P)/
:O((A(P
://A)
://(/
:A)/(P(
:)P)(()P
:)P()
:(AOAA
:PPP/(
:P)P)
:O/P((
://)/P/
:O()P
:(P)
:OO/PA
:O(P/
:)PP
:()A/(
:PPO
:(P
:)/O/A
:/OAO
:/O(O(/
:)(AP
:AO)))A
:P(AO
:/))(((
:AA(/O
:PO))P/(
:)/OA(
:)(PO
:A)OO
:/(O
:OO(P
:/POAP
:AA(P()
:(P/
:)/
:)(A
:(((OP(
:P(/O
:/)O))
:))//(
:(AAO
:P/A
:(OO
:OP)OA
:()A/P
:AOO/
:P(P/)
://OP
:A)OO/
:)))A/
:(AP())/
:P()((
:(PO
:AP(()O)
:AAO((
:AO/(
:A(A(O
:A(OP
:A(OA
:((AO/
:P)(/)
:(OA
:AA)PO
:O)O/(
:P)//
:PA)
:O/AA
:AO)/
:(O)O)
:A)/A
:)()
:O)(O/
:A/AOA(P
:)OAP
:O/PO
:O)AP
:/
:(P(OP
:/(O
:/)/(
:)(P(
:A)(OP/
:)P)/
APPENDIX 7
" " #$
%&'
#'&(
)'