RECEIVED
BEFORETHE
POSTAL RATE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC. 20268-0001
hi 3 I; 3c i);i ‘02
;i 1.
:,;.:;;;
.,
,,I
Docket No. R2001-1
POSTALRATEANDFEE CHANGES,2001
NOTICE OF FILING ERRATA TO USPS LR-J-131
The United States Postal Service hereby gives notice of the filing of errata
to USPS LR-J-131, which consists of the workpapers of witness Hope (USPS-T31). The errata are summarized as follows:
WPl, Page H (“COST”) and WP2, Page H (“NCOST”) - Heading, line 6
l
should read “Nonletters”. Footnotes 1 and 2 should read:
(1) USPS-LR-J-59, Workbook LR-Jdg.xls, Table 1
(2) USPS-LR-J-58, Workbook LR-J-58.x1% Summary and
USPS-LR-J-117.xls, Table 1.
.
WP2, Page J (“NRES SHAPE LEAK”) -Title, 3’d line should read, “Estimated
After Rates Revenue for FY 2003”.
.
WPl, Page F (“TYBR SUM”) - Footnote 1 should read:
(1). Page E, Line 27 for ECR; WP2, Page E, Line 27 for NECR.
Respectfully submitted,
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
By its attorneys:
Daniel J. Foucheaux, Jr.
Chief Counsel, Ratemaking
&AWL
Anthony Alverno 0
Attorney
USPS-LR-J-131
REVISED 01/03/02
Test Year Before Rates Summary
Revenue
(1)
306.690
5351.52
NECR
ECR
TOTAL
(1)
(2)
(3)
‘(4)
Cost With
Contingency
(2)
Contribution
(3)
Coverage
(4)
Page E, Line 27 for ECR;
USPS-T-12, WP F, Table E
Cal (1) - Cal (2)
Cal (1) I Cal (2)
TYBR SUM
WP 1, page F
USPS-LRJ-131
REVISED 01/03/02
Mail Processing and Delivery Costs Per Piece
Test Year (in cents)
I
2
3
4
5
5
7
8
9
Enhanced Carrier
Letters
Auto
Basic
High-density
Route
Processing
(1)
Delivery
TOtal
(2)
(3)
6.211
9.150
5.353
4.043
rm
9.401
6.014
5.183
High-density
Saturation
COST
WPl,pageH
USPS-LR-J-131
REVISED 01/03/02
Mail Processing and Delivery Costs Per Piece
Test Year (in cents)
Nonprofit
Letters
AM0
Basic
High-density
Saturation
Enhanced
Carrier
Route
a
High-density
Saturation
NCOST
WP 2, page H
USPS-L&J-131
REVISED 01/03/02
WP 2. page J
Expected Revenue from Residual Shape Surcharge
for Use in Formula
Estimated After Rates Revenue for
1
After Rates
Before Rates
Nonprofit
NonprofIt
ECR Subclass
ECR Subclass
I
1,623.63
0.157%
,,631.94
0.157%
I/
.?I
P/AR Volume Nonletters
% Residual Shape
Net Projected Volume
x Surcharge (cents)
2.562
0.200
3,
4/
Expected residual VOlume
x Surcharge (cents)
2.549
0.200
Expected Revenue
(E Millions)
0.512
51
Expected Revenue
($ Millions)
0.510
TYSR Volume Nonletiers
% Residual Shape
I/ Page D, total nonletters in NECR.
2! Assume residual shape percentage remains constant
See footnote #2, p. I.
3/ Volume of nonletters x % residual shape pieces.
4/ Proposed surcharge.
51 Expected volume x proposed surcharge.
at A/S.
NRES SHAPE LEAK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document
upon all participants of record in this proceeding in accordance with section
12 of the Rules of Practice.
fhWZb-kA4uc-e
Anthony Alverno
475 L’Enfant Plaza West, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20260-l 137
(202) 268-2997; Fax -6187
January 3,2002