Provider Peer Grouping Monthly Updates November 21, 2011 Stefan Gildemeister Interim Director, Health Economics Program What is Provider Peer Grouping? • A system for publicly comparing provider performance on cost and quality – …a uniform method of calculating providers' relative cost of care, defined as a measure of health care spending including resource use and unit prices, and relative quality of care… (M.S.§62U.04, Subd. 2) – a combined measure that incorporates both provider riskadjusted cost of care and quality of care… (M.S.§62U.04, Subd. 3) What Types of Provider Peer Grouping Needs to be Developed? 1. Total Care 2. Care for Specific Conditions The commissioner shall develop a peer grouping system for providers based on a combined measure that incorporates both provider risk-adjusted cost of care and quality of care, and for specific conditions… (M.S.§62U.04, Subd. 3) Stakeholder Involvement • Provider Peer Grouping Advisory Group • Rapid Response Team • Reliability Workgroup • Monthly Conference Calls Methodological Update: Hospital Total Care Analysis Hospital Total Care Reports • MDH released Hospital Total Care reports on September 27 by email and mail • MDH hosted a webinar on September 29 to explain PPG information to hospitals • MDH also hosted 3 regional meetings in the Twin Cities, Rochester, and Duluth on October 4-5 • MDH invited input from hospitals via these forums as well as an electronic feedback process • October 21st communication to hospitals Cost Composite Modifications • Issue: Missing discharges • Solution: Improved data set – More current data set • Public program and commercial claims for the full 2009 calendar year • Medicare claims still for calendar year 2008 – More complete accounting of Minnesota hospital claims Cost Composite Modifications • Issue: Surgical case allocation • Solution: Corrected grouping software Cost Composite Modifications • Issue: Medicaid and Medicare managed care discharges reported as Commercial • Solution: Improved managed care claim allocation – Payer type will be more representative of hospitals’ patient population Cost Composite Modifications • Potential Risk Adjustment Changes – Hospital characteristics • Burns • Transplants • Neonatal care – Outlier payments – ACG look-back period Quality Composite Modification • Topped-Out Measures – Measures for which performance is almost uniformly very high are referred to as “topped out” measures – These measures will continue to be included in this iteration of the hospital total care analysis – MDH is exploring alternate ways to handle these measures which do not penalize high performers who are slightly below the highest performers Progress Update Timeline for Modified Hospital Reports • MDH will continue to communicate with hospitals on its progress • Modified reports will be disseminated in early 2012 • Hospitals will have an opportunity to confidentially review their results for 30 days • Hospitals will also be able to review and comment on the proposed online mechanism for public reporting – Details have not been finalized Timeline for Physician Clinic Analysis • Volume of data for physician clinic analysis is greater than for hospitals • MDH has improved its research environment to allow for faster processing of data • MDH will continue to provide more concrete updates on timing in the future For more information, see www.health.state.mn.us/ healthreform/peer/index.html Questions can be sent to Stefan Gildemeister at Stefan.Gildemeister@state.mn.us or 651-201-3554 Next call Monday, December 12, 2011 7:30 am
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz