G U I D E T O R E A D I N G N O T E S Following are possible answers for each section of the Reading Notes. Section 2 1. Civil liberties are freedoms that are an individual’s birthright, such as the freedoms of speech, religion, and assembly. They are not something the government can legitimately take away. Civil rights are rights of citizenship that come with being a member of society, such as the right to a trial by jury and the right to legal counsel. 2. The Fourteenth Amendment denies the states the ability to infringe on civil liberties and rights. Though narrowly interpreted at first, the amendment eventually prevented states from abridging the rights of U.S. citizens. In Gitlow v. New York, the Court reversed the previous limitations it had set on the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Due Process Clause extended the reach of the Bill of Rights to the states. 3. The Supreme Court reviews the decisions made by lower courts. It does not retry cases. If the Court reverses a decision made by a lower court, the case usually returns to a lower appeals court to allow for a decision that fits with the current Supreme Court opinion. Sections 3 to 6 Illustrations will vary. First Amendment Rights protected: The First Amendment guarantees the separation of church and state, establishes that people are free to follow the religious practices of their choice, allows citizens to express ideas freely, protects the media from censorship, and allows people to assemble and to petition the government about grievances. Precedents: In Engel v. Vitale, the Court struck down state-sponsored prayer in schools. In Lemon v. Kurtzman, the Court established the “Lemon test” to determine whether the Establishment Clause has been violated. In West Virginia Board © Teachers’ Curriculum Institute of Education v. Barnette, the Court held that the government must show a compelling interest in forcing people to obey a law that violates their religious convictions. In Brandenburg v. Ohio, the Court created a two-part test to determine whether speech creates a “clear and present danger.” In Texas v. Johnson, the Court held that flag burning is protected symbolic speech. In Near v. Minnesota, the Court declared that government attempts at prior restraint are unconstitutional, except under special circumstances. Second Amendment Rights protected: This amendment guarantees citizens the right to own firearms. Precedent: In United States v. Miller, the Court supported the conviction of two men who had not registered a sawed-off shotgun on the grounds that because militias would not use these guns, the government has a right to regulate them. Third Amendment Rights protected: This amendment prohibits citizens from being forced to house soldiers. Fourth Amendment Rights protected: This amendment protects people’s privacy by prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures without a warrant and ensuring that a warrant is issued only if there is probable cause and if police are specific about what they are looking for. Precedents: In Katz v. United States, the Court established the notion of a “reasonable expectation of privacy” when deciding whether a warrant is needed. In Terry v. Ohio, the Court expanded the rights of police to search individuals if they have a reasonable justification for doing so. Fifth Amendment Rights protected: This amendment protects suspects from self-incrimination. It also protects them against double jeopardy and says that the governThe Bill of Rights and Civil Liberties 1 G U I D E T O R E A D I N G N O T E S ment cannot take property for public use without paying a fair price for it. Precedent: In Miranda v. Arizona, the Court set forth a procedure for ensuring that suspects know their rights, now called Miranda rights. Sixth Amendment Rights protected: This amendment explains how trials are to be carried out to protect the rights of the accused: quickly, publicly, and in front of a jury, with all evidence presented to the defendant, who has the right to legal counsel. Precedents: In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Court determined that the guarantee of a lawyer should not depend on a defendant’s ability to pay. In Sheppard v. Maxwell, the Court determined that press coverage should not interfere with a defendant’s right to due process. Ninth Amendment Rights protected: This amendment acknowledges that rights other than those specified in these amendments may exist and offers protection of these unenumerated rights. Precedent: In Griswold v. Connecticut, the Court declared that the Ninth Amendment includes the right to privacy. Tenth Amendment Rights protected: This amendment limits the powers of the federal government to those specifically granted by the Constitution and reserves other powers to the states and the people. Precedent: In United States v. Morrison, the Court held that violent crime between individuals is an issue for the states. Seventh Amendment Rights protected: This amendment guarantees trial by jury in most civil lawsuits. Eighth Amendment Rights protected: This amendment protects suspects from excessive bail, fines, or cruel and unusual punishment. Precedents: In In re Kemmler, the Court held that any method of execution is acceptable, as long as it does not involve “torture or lingering death.” In Furman v. Georgia, the Court held that capital punishment is “cruel and unusual” when inconsistently applied, causing states to rewrite their laws to apply capital punishment more consistently. In Gregg v. Georgia, the Court held that the death penalty is constitutional. © Teachers’ Curriculum Institute The Bill of Rights and Civil Liberties 2
© Copyright 2025 Paperzz