Biol. Mar. Mediterr. (2010), 17 (1): 72-73 I. Locci, M. Espa, F. Palmas, A.A. Pendugiu, P. Pesci, A. Sabatini Department of Animal Biology and Ecology, University of Cagliari, Via T. Fiorelli, 1 - 09126 Cagliari, Italy. ilocci@uniss.it BIODIVERSITY INDEX EVOLUTION IN SHALLOW WATER AREAS OF SARDINIAN SEAS (10-100 M) EVOLUZIONE DEGLI INDICI DI BIODIVERSITÀ NELLA FASCIA COSTIERA DEI MARI SARDI (10-100 M) Abstract – Biological diversity is considered an important factor for ecosystem stability. The aim of this study is to examine the temporal evolution of classical biodiversity indexes for shallow waters (10-100 m) demersal assemblages in specific locations of the Sardinian seas, which have been subject to different fishing pressure over the past 14 years (1994-2007). Our results indicate that fishing pressure appeared to affect the diversity of shallow waters species, showing different biodiversity index reactions on different levels of fishing effort. The validity and reliability of this index as a measure of environmental stress and its potential use for the monitoring of demersal ecosystem is then discussed. Key-words: demersal assemblages, Sardinia, biodiversity. Introduction - The high concentration of human population near coasts and the oceans’ productive coastal margins, strongly affects marine ecosystems and its resources (Halpern et al., 2008). Industrial fishing in particular can have both direct and indirect consequences on marine systems (Fogarty et al., 1998; Greenstreet and Hall, 1996), including effects on species diversity. Several studies have underlined the role of biodiversity in ecosystem functioning (Worm et al., 2006; Hector and Bagchi, 2007). In the light of the above, come out the importance of biological diversity, and the development of further tools for monitoring its status should be considered imperative. The aim of this study is to examine the answer of biodiversity indexes in consequence of fleet evolution, on shallow waters demersal assemblages. Materials and methods – Data were collected over 1994-2007 period, within the framework of the international MEDITS research programme. The year 2002 was excluded due to a sensible delay in starting the survey. Only the 10-100 m depth range were considered. Species abundances data were used to calculate Shannon’s index (H’), species richness (lnS) and Pielou’s evenness (J’). Fishing effort were evaluated by means of Regione Autonoma della Sardegna fleet archives. These data regarded the number of trawlers (<30 GT) involved in shallow water fishing, considering 7 separated zones. Results – Investigated areas, due to fleet renewal which involved the replacement of the old low-tonnage wooden boats with large deep sea iron boats, have been subjected to a decreasing fishing pressure over the past 14 years, resulting in a general decrease of about 24% in fishing boats but different for each zone (Tab. 1). We found sensible changes in biodiversity, with an increase for areas SE, N, and S and a decrease for area W. These results are in agreement with the diverse behavior of fishing effort, which usually display opposite trends than biodiversity indexes do. Conclusions – The use of biodiversity indexes as an instrument for assessing marine resources is a subject of continued debate (Ungaro et al., 1998). Our analysis on biodiversity, based on data from 14 annual trawl surveys, showed different temporal trends in the 8 areas considered. The varying intensity of Biodiversity index evolution in shallow water areas of Sardinian seas Fig. 1 - Location of the investigated areas. Localizzazione delle aree investigate. 73 Tab. 1 - Shannon’s index trends. Trends dell’indice di Shannon. exploitation described, enabled us to identify the effects that such disturbance has had on biodiversity, both positively correlated with fishery yield (Ungaro et al., 1998; Worm et al., 2006). According to our results evaluation of biodiversity trend evolution, allow us to detect environmental modifications that otherwise would pass unnoticed. Although further investigations are necessary, biodiversity indexes could be an important support to classical stock assessment methodologies. References FOGARTY M.J., MURAWSKI S.A. (1998) - Large-scale disturbance and the structure of marine systems: fishery impacts on Georges Bank. Ecological Applications, 8 (1 Suppl.): 6–22. GREENSTREET S.P.R., HALL S.J. (1996) - Fishing and the ground-fish assemblage structure in the North-western North Sea: an analysis of long-term and spatial trends. Journal of Animal Ecology, 65: 577–598. HALPERN B.S., WALBRIDGE S., SELKOE K.A., KAPPEL C.V., MICHELI F., D’AGROSA C., BRUNO J.F., CASEY K.S., EBERT C., FOX H.E., FUJITA R., HEINEMANN D., LENIHAN H.S., MADIN E.M.P., PERRY M.T., SELIG E.R., SPALDING M., STENECK R., WATSON R. (2008) - A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems. Science, 319: 948–952. HECTOR A., BAGCHI R. (2007) - Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality Nature, 448: 188–191. UNGARO N., MARANO G., MARSAN R., OSTMANI K. (1998) - Demersal fish assemblage biodiversity as an index of fishery resources exploitation. Ital. J. Zool., 65 (Suppl.): 511-516. WORM B., BARBIER E.B., BEAUMONT N., DUFFY J.E., FOLKE C., HALPEN B.S., JACKSON J.B.C., LOTZE H. K., MICHELI F., PALUMBI S.R., SALA E., SELKOE K.A., STACHOWICZ J.J., WATSON R. (2006) - Impact of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science, 314: 787–790.
© Copyright 2024 Paperzz